Law v Warren

CourtUnspecified Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Townsing Henry George v Jenton Overseas Investment Pte Ltd (in liquidation)
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 12 March 2007
    ......Furthermore, there is authority to show that until rectified, documents remain binding in their current form: see, for example, Stansfield v Stansfield [1985] 3 NZFLR 385 ; R v Croydon and District Rent Tribunal [1948] 1 KB 60. As Sugden LC said in Law v Warren" (1843) Dr t Sugd 31 at 41, “so long as [the document] remains uncorrected, it is no defence to say, that it does not truly ascertain the real contract of the parties”. . What was Normandy’s entitlement to rectification? . 42        There is another reason why the issue of Normandy\xE2"......
  • The Nile Rhapsody
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT