Lichters and Another -v- Depfa Bank Plc
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judge | Mr. Justice Hedigan |
| Judgment Date | 18 January 2012 |
| Neutral Citation | [2012] IEHC 10 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [2012] 1 JIC 1808 |
| Court | High Court |
| Date | 18 January 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
18 cases
-
Cleary v B & Q Ireland Ltd
...high onus on an employee who claims that the discretion was unreasonably exercised (per Hedigan J., in Lichters & Hass -v- Depfa Bank plc [2012] IEHC 10). Having regard to the fact that the respondent was obliged to seek examinership and that it was clearly in a very difficult financial sit......
-
ADJ-00043686 - Workplace Relations Commission Carolina Hennessy v Cognizant Technology Solutions Ireland Ltd
...unfettered and must be exercised reasonably and in good faith Horkaluk v Cantor Fitzgerald [2004] 1 ICR 697 and Lichters & Hass v Depfa [2012] IEHC 10.Hedigan J in Lichters affirmed that a discretion is not unfettered:In Clarke v Nomura International [2000] IRLR 766 the Court of Appeal for ......
-
Case Number: ADJ-00032655. Workplace Relations Commission
...unfettered and must be exercised reasonably and in good faith Horkaluk v Cantor Fitzgerald [2004] 1 ICR 697 and Lichters & Hass v Depfa [2012] IEHC 10.However, in this case there is no absolute contractual right to reduce the working week.I note the employer relies on section 5(2)(i) which ......
-
Case Number: ADJ-00037000. Workplace Relations Commission
...unfettered and must be exercised reasonably and in good faith Horkaluk v Cantor Fitzgerald [2004] 1 ICR 697 and Lichters & Hass v Depfa [2012] IEHC 10.Hedigan J in Lichters affirmed that a discretion is not unfettered:In Clarke v Nomura International [2000] IRLR 766 the Court of Appeal for ......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Employment Matters - Easter 2012
...and fair, otherwise he may incur liability. Replacement of Deferred Stock Scheme with Deferred Cash Scheme Lichters and Hass v DEPFA Bank [2012] IEHC 10 concerned non-payment of deferred bonus awards. The company replaced its deferred stock scheme with a deferred cash scheme. It was no long......