Listowel Urban District Council v McDonagh

JurisdictionIreland
Judgment Date18 December 1968
Date18 December 1968
CourtSupreme Court
(S.C.)
Listowel Urban District Council
and
McDonagh

Contravention of order - Whether defendant entitled to put in issue bona fides of sanitary authority -Local Government (Sanitary Services) Act, 1948, s. 31.

The defendant was convicted, in the District Court, of having contravened an order made by a sanitary authority in exercise of a power conferred by statute. He appealed to the Circuit Court where he sought an opportunity to question the bona fides of the sanitary authority in making the order. H...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 cases
  • Slatterys Ltd v Commissioner of Valuation
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 13 July 2001
    ...1981 IR 181 URBAN RENEWAL ACT 1986 (REMISSION OF RATES) SCHEME 1991 SI 157/1991 ART 5(b) LISTOWEL URBAN DISTRICT COUNCIL (UDC) V MCDONAGH 1968 IR 312 WANDSWORTH LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL V WINDER 1985 AC 461 KEEGAN, STATE V STARDUST COMPENSATION TRIBUNAL 1986 IR 642 HARPER STORES LTD V COMMI......
  • Blanchfield v Hartnett and Others
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 16 May 2002
    ...LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL V WINDER 1985 AC 461 KRUSE V JOHNSON 1898 2 QB 91 R V READING CROWN COURT 1988 QB 384 LISTOWEL UDC V MCDONAGH 1968 IR 312 SLATTERY'S LTD V COMMR OF VALUATION & DEVALLY UNREP SUPREME 13.7.2001 AG, PEOPLE V O'BRIEN 1965 IR 142 DPP, PEOPLE V LYNCH 1982 IR 64 PORTSM......
  • Treasury Holdings & Others v National Asset Management Agency & Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 22 March 2012
    ...Health Insurance Board [1992] 2 IR 319, O'Keeffe v An Bord Pleanála [1993] 1 IR 39, Listowel Urban District Council v McDonagh [1968] IR 312, Pine Valley Developments v Minister for the Environment [1987] IR 23, Broadnet Ltd v Director of Telecommunication Regulation [2003] 3 IR 281, Coun......
  • Mullally v The Labour Court
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 20 October 2016
    ...Institute of Technology [2011] IEHC 414, (Unreported, High Court, Hogan J., 26 July 2011). Listowel Urban District Council v. McDonagh [1968] I.R. 312. MacDonncha v. Minister for Education and Skills [2013] IEHC 226, (Unreported, High Court, Hogan J., 29 May 2013). Maguire v. Ardagh [2002] ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • In the Irish Courts
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 35-1, January 1971
    • 1 January 1971
    ...or detentionwouldbe prejudicial to publichealth(etc.),InListotoel U.D.C. o, McDonagh (1968,I.R.312) a localauthorityhadmadesuchanorder,whichrecitedtheauthority's opinionthatanysucherection or detention would be prejudicial topublichealth.Thedefendant,havingbeenconvictedofretaining acaravanw......