Lord Advocate v Lord Lovat

JurisdictionIreland
CourtHouse of Lords (Ireland)
Judgment Date12 July 1880
Date12 July 1880
Docket NumberNo. 12.
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 cases
  • Ulster Investment Bank Ltd v Rockrohan Estate Ltd
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 26 February 2015
    ...must be had to the individual circumstances of possession. The matter was put thus by Lord O'Hagan in Lord Advocate v Lord Lovat (1880) 5 App Cas 273 at page 288: 22 As to possession, it must be considered in every case with reference to the peculiar circumstances. The acts, implying posses......
  • Keelgrove Properties Ltd v Shelbourne Development Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 8 July 2005
    ...... v Griffin [1969] 1 WLR23; Treloar v Nute [1976] 1 WLR 1295; LordAdvocate v Lord Lovat (1880) 5 App Cas273; Leigh v Jack (1879) 5 Ex D 264;Wallis's ...Nute, Lord O'Hagan in The Lord Advocate v. Lord Lovat said at p. 288 of the report:- "As to ......
  • Dunne v Iarnródéireann
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 28 July 2016
    ...(in receivership) v Crowley (No 3) [2003] 1 IR 396 at 425 per Denham J, is a classic statement to that effect by Lord O'Hagan in Lord Advocate v Lord Lovat (1880) 5 App Cas 273 at 288: As to possession, it must be considered in every case with reference to the peculiar circumstances. The a......
  • Bakewell Management Ltd v Brandwood and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 January 2003
    ...leave any correction of the error to the House of Lords. Was the decision in Hanning made per incuriam? 22 Mr Morgan relies on The Lord Advocate v Lord Lovat (1880) 5 App. Cas. 273 as a decision with which Hanning is inconsistent. There Lord Lovat disputed the right of the Crown to the salm......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • NOTES OF CASES
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 38-3, May 1975
    • 1 May 1975
    ...3 All E.R. 589C. z7 I19741 3 W.L.R. at p. 403F: 119741 3 All E.R. 590D. quoting Lord O’Hanan in .- Lord Advocufe v. Lord Lovat (1880) 5-App.Cas. 273, 288. 28 [1974] 3 W.L.R. at p. 404A; [1974] 3 All E.R. at p. 590F, quoting Sellers L.J. in Wtlliums v. Ruffery at 173. 29 e.g. where the iiser......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT