M'Carthy v M'Cartie

JurisdictionIreland
CourtHouse of Lords (Ireland)
Judgment Date18 November 1897
Date18 November 1897

H. L.

Lords Herschell, Macnaghten, Morris and Shand

M'CARTHY
and

M'CARTIE.

Cannon v. VillarsELR 8 Ch. D. 415.

Cannon v. VillarsELRELR L. R. 17 Eq. 158; L. R. 10 Ch. 586.

Dand v. KingscoteENR 6 M. & W. 174.

Eastern Railway CompanyELR L. R. 10 Ch. 586.

Finch v. Great Western Railway Co.ELR 5 Ex. D. 254.

Mayor of New Windsor v. StovellELR 27 Ch. D. 665.

Newcomen v. CoulsonELR 5 Ch. D. 133.

Norton v. London and North Western Railway Co.ELR 9 Ch. D. 623.

Norton v. London and North Western Railway CompanyELRELR 9 Ch. D. 623; 13 Ch. D. 268.

United Land Company v. Great Eastern Railway CompanyELR L. R. 10 Ch. 586.

United Land Company v. Great Eastern Railway CompanyELRELR L. R. 17 Eq. 158; L. R. 10 Ch. 586.

Acquiescence — Lapse of time.

YoL. L] CHANCERY DIVISION. 609 M'CARTHY v. M'CARTIE. Acquiescence—Lapse of time. APPEAL by the Bank of Ireland from the decision of the Court of Appeal, ante, p. 112. Latham, Q. C., and Howard Wright (both of the English Bar), for the appellants. THE HousE of LORDS (Lords Hersehell, Macnaghten, Morris, and Shand), without calling on Ronan, Q. C., and E. S. Ford (of the English Bar), for the respondents, dismissed the appeal, with costs (1). Solicitors for the appellants : Freshfields 4 Williams. Solicitors for the respondents : Street, Poynder, 4 Whatley. (1) See W. N. (97), 164 (12) ; 104 L. T. 82.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT