MacCausland and Kimmitt v Carroll and Dooley
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1938 |
| Date | 01 January 1938 |
| Court | High Court |
MacCausland and Kimmitt
and
Carroll and Dooley
For payment of rent - Set-off - Unliquidated claim - Defences available to surety - Circuit Court Rules, Or. 7, rr. 5, 6 - Landlord and Tenant Law Amendment Act (Ir.), 1860 (23 24 Vict., c. 154), s. 48.
A. became tenant of a dwelling-house and certain premises to B. and C. under an agreement whereby A. agreed to pay rent and to keep the premises with the exception of the roof in repair and B. and C. covenanted to keep the roof in repair. By agreement...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Harrisrange Ltd v Duncan
...& TENANT (AMDT) ACT 1980 S87 LANDLORD & TENANT LAW (AMDT) ACT (IRL) 1860 (DEASY'S ACT) S48 MAC CAUSLAND & KIMMITT V CARROLL & DOOLEY 1938 72 ILTR 158 1 Mr. Justice William M. McKechnie delivered the 25th day of January, 2 1. By Indenture of Lease made the 17th day of May, 1977, between MEP......
-
Westpark Investments Ltd and Another v Leisureworld Ltd and Another
...defence or counterclaim to defendants - Whether defendants entitled to invoke doctrine of equitable set-off - MacCausland v Carroll (1938) 72 ILTR 158; Prendergast v Biddle (Unrep, SC, 31/71957); Hong Kong Fir Shipping Company v Kawasaki [1962] 2 QB 26; Moohan v SR Motors (Donegal) Ltd [200......
-
The Leopardstown Club Ltd v Templeville Developments Ltd
...& TENANT LAW PAR 12.09 LANDLORD & TENANT LAW (AMDT) ACT (IRL) 1860 (see DEASYS ACT) S48 MAC CAUSLAND & KIMMITT v CARROLL & DOOLEY 1938 72 ILTR 158 RIORDAN v CARROLL 1996 2 ILRM 263 DOWLING SET OFF AGAINST RENT ASSIGNMENT & SUBLETTING IN BREACH OF COVENANT NILQ VOL 39 NO 3 258 BRITISH ANZAN......
-
Crumlin Investments Ltd v Mountaine
...charges were paid within eight weeks. Citations: RSC O.37 r4 LANDLORD & TENANT (IRL) ACT 1860 (DEASYS ACT) S48 MCCAUSLAND V CARROLL 1938 72 ILTR 158 SWEENEY V POWERSCOURT 1984 IR 503 Master of the High Court 1 The Plaintiff's motion for liberty to enter final judgment for £61,834.11 inclus......
Get Started for Free