Minister for Industry and Commerce v Healy [High Court.; Supreme Court.]
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1941 |
| Date | 01 January 1941 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
(H.C., S.C.),
Minister for Industry and Commerce
and
Healy
Conditions of Employment Act, 1936 (No. 2 of 1936), ss. 2 and 17 -Conditions of Employment (Men's and Boys' Tailoring) (Prohibition of Employment of Out-workers) Order, 1937 (No. 270 of 1937) - Practice - Procedure - Case Stated - District Justice stating case after summons dismissed - Case purporting, by error, to be stated under s. 83 of the Courts of Justice Act, 1924 - Error not formally rectified by District Justice - Case treated by consent as though stated under s. 6 of the Summary Jurisdiction Act, 1857 - Appeal from decision of High Court - Leave to appeal not obtained from High Court - Whether jurisdiction to hear appeal - Courts of Justice Act, 1924 (No. 10 of 1924), s. 83 - Courts of Justice Act, 1936 (No. 48 of1936), s. 56 - Summary Jurisdiction Act, 1857 (20 21 Vict. c. 43, s. 6.
Defendant was charged with being employed as an outworker in a prohibited form of industrial work within a...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
17 cases
-
Sullivan v Robinson
... ... Supreme Court - Appellate jurisdiction from "all s" of the High Court - Appeal by complainant from decision of ... So held by the Supreme Court. Minister for Industry and Commerce v. HealyIR [1941] I.R ... ...
-
Minister for Justice v Wang Zhu Jie
...ACT 1964 S31 COURTS (SUPP PROV) ACT 1961 S52(1) COURTS (SUPP PROV) ACT 1961 S52(2) CONSTITUTION ART 34 MIN FOR INDUSTRY & COMMERCE V HEALY 1941 IR 545 SULLIVAN V ROBINSON 1954 IR 161 COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT 1936 S39 COURTS (SUPP PROV) ACT 1961 S48 BEECHAM GROUP V BRISTOL MYERS 1983 IR 325 1 J......
-
In the Application of Galfer Filling Station Ltd
...Act) of the High Court on a question of law referred to the High Court under that section.” In Minister for Industry and Commerce v Healy [1941] IR 545 leave to appeal was not sought prior to the appellant appealing the opinion of the High Court on a case stated. The Supreme Court found tha......
-
ADJ-00037806 - Workplace Relations Commission Michelle Collins v Tile & Wood Factory Outlet (Limerick) Limited
...of remuneration. The Control TestThe test was applied by the High Court in Minister for Industry & Commerce v Elizabeth Healy [1941] IR 545 and by the Supreme Court in Roche v Kelly and Co Ltd. [1969] IR 100 where Walsh J held that in master-servant relationship the master must have the rig......
Get Started for Free