Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform v Bailey
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judge | Denham C.J.,Murray J.,Mr. Justice Hardiman,Mr. Justice Fennelly,O'Donnell J. |
Judgment Date | 01 March 2012 |
Neutral Citation | [2012] IESC 16 |
Court | Supreme Court |
Date | 01 March 2012 |
and
[2012] IESC 16
Denham C.J.
Murray J.
Hardiman J.
Fennelly J.
O'Donnell J.
THE SUPREME COURT
Criminal law - Criminal procedure - European arrest warrant - France - Surrender - Extra-territorial prosecution - Refusal - Fundamental rights - Reciprocity - Point of law of exceptional public importance - Whether British national could be surrendered to France for offence allegedly committed in Ireland in absence of decision of prosecute
Facts: A European arrest warrant was issued by the Republic of France in respect of Ian Bailey for the murder of a French citizen in Ireland. The appellant resisted his surrender pursuant to the warrant to France. The High Court certified a point of law of exceptional public importance to the Supreme Court to consider the extra-territorial jurisdiction to prosecute an offence where the Director of Public Prosecutions had elected not to prosecute an individual. The Court considered the jurisdiction to surrender the appellant, surrender outside the territory, whether it was an abuse of process or unjust or in breach of his fundamental rights to surrender him pursuant to s. 44 of the European arrest warrant Act 2003, s. 42 of the Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) Act 2005, s. 21 A of the Act of 2003, as amended by the Act of 2005 and s. 37 of the Act of 2003.
Held by the Supreme Court per Denham C.J. (Murray, Hardiman, Fennelly, O' Donnell JJ. concurring), that no decision had been made to try him for the murder. The terms of s. 21A were not met. It was a question of Irish law whether the requirements of s.21 A of the Act of 2003, as amended, were met. A Court had to refuse to surrender a requested person when it was satisfied that no decision had been made to charge and try him. On this ground the appeal would be allowed. The appeal would also be allowed on the basis of s. 44. The appeal would not be allowed in respect of the s. 42 ground.
Per Murray J.: It was not necessary to consider the effects of s. 37 in the proceedings. Per Fennelly J.: It was perfectly possible to interpret s. 44 in conformity with the Framework Decision. Per Hardiman J.: As he was not an Irish citizen, s. 44 operated to preclude his forcible delivery to France. There was an absence of reciprocity.
Reporter: E.F.
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S16(12)
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 2009 S12
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S44
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S42(C)
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S42
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (TERRORIST OFFENCES) ACT 2005 S68
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S37
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S21A
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S20(1)
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S13
OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON ACT 1861 S9
OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON ACT 1861 (SECTION 9) ADAPTATION ORDER 1973 SI 356/1973 ART 3
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 13.6.2002 (EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003) ART 4
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 13.6.2002 (EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003) ART 4(7)
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 13.6.2002 (EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003) ART 4(7)(A)
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 13.6.2002 (EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003) ART 4(7)(B)
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON EXTRADITION 13.12.1957 ART 7
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON EXTRADITION 13.12.1957 ART 26
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 13.6.2002 (EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003) ART 2(2)
BLEKXTOON & VAN BALLEGOOIJ (EDS) HANDBOOK ON THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT 2004 74
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (TERRORIST OFFENCES) ACT 2005 S83
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S42(A)
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S42(B)
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (TERRORIST OFFENCES) ACT 2005 PART VIII
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S14(7)
SLOAN v CULLIGAN 1992 1 IR 223
EXTRADITION (EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON THE SUPPRESSION OF TERRORISM) ACT 1987 S3
EXTRADITION (EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON THE SUPPRESSION OF TERRORISM) ACT 1987 S1(4)
CONSTITUTION ART 15.5
CONSTITUTION ART 40.3
INTERPRETATION ACT 2005 S27
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 13.6.2002 (EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003) ART 1
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S10
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (TERRORIST OFFENCES) ACT 2005 S79
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S21A(1)
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S21A(2)
CRIMINAL CODE OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ART 221.1
CRIMINAL CODE OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ART 221.3
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ART 80
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ART 175
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ART 122
CONSTITUTION OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ART 64
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ART 81
CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PUPINO, IN RE 2005 ECR I-5285 2006 QB 83 2005 3 WLR 1102 2006 AER (EC) 142
MIN FOR JUSTICE v DUNDON 2005 1 IR 261 2005 2 ILRM 149 2005/39/8021 2005 IESC 13
MIN FOR JUSTICE v ALTARAVICIUS 2006 3 IR 148 2006/39/8296 2006 IESC 23
MIN FOR JUSTICE v TOBIN 2008 4 IR 42
OLSSON v MIN FOR JUSTICE 2011 1 IR 384 2011 2 ILRM 395 2011 IESC 1
CRIMINAL CODE OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ART 113.7
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 13.6.2002 (EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003) ART 1(1)
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 13.6.2002 (EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003) ART 1(2)
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S16
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S16(1)
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S16(1)(D)
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S11(1)
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S11
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 1967 S8
DPP v JUDGE DEVINS UNREP SUPREME 8.2.2012 2012 IESC 7
MIN FOR JUSTICE v MCARDLE 2005 4 IR 260 2006 1 ILRM 263 2005/38/7955 2005 IESC 76
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 13.6.2002 (EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003) ART 8
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S11(1)(D)
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S4
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 PART III
PROSECUTION OF OFFENCES ACT 1974 S6
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ART 695.22
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ART 695.24
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ART 695.24(4)
CRIMINAL CODE OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ART 113.2
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ART 695.23
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ART 695.24(3)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ART 695.24(1)
FARRELL & HANRAHAN THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT IN IRELAND 2011 PARA 12.21
MIN FOR JUSTICE v AAMOND UNREP PEART 24.11.2006 2006/39/8277 2006 IEHC 382
AAMAND v JUDGE SMITHWICK & AG 1995 1 ILRM 61 1994/8/2009
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 13.6.2002 (EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003) ART 2
CRIMINAL LAW ACT 19971997 SCHED 3
EXTRADITION ACT 1965 S8(1)
EXTRADITION ACT 1965 (PART II) (NO 23) ORDER 1989 SI 9/1989
EXTRADITION ACT 1965 S8
EXTRADITION ACT 1965 PART II
CONSTITUTION ART 40.4
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON EXTRADITION 13.12.1957 ART 7(2)
CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PUPINO 2006 QB 83 2005 3 WLR 1102 2006 AER (EC) 142 2005 ECR I-5285 2005 2 CMLR 63
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 13.6.2002 (EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003) ART 2(1)
VON COLSON & KAMANN v LAND NORDRHEIN-WESTFAHLEN 1984 ECR 1891 1986 2 CMLR 430
MARLEASING SA v LA COMERCIAL INTERNACIONAL DE ALIMENTACION SA 1990 ECR I-4135 1993 BCC 421 1992 1 CMLR 305
TREATY OF ROME ART 10
TREATY ON EUROPEAN UNION ART 35
NV ALGEMENE TRANSPORT EN EXPEDITIE ONDERNEMING VAN GEND EN LOOS v NEDERLANDSE ADMINISTRATIE DER BELASTINGEN 1963 ECR 1 1963 CMLR 105
MERCK & CO INC v PRIMECROWN LTD 1996 ECR I-6285 1997 1 CMLR 83 1997 FSR 237
BECKER v FINANZAMT MUNSTER-INNENSTADT 1982 ECR 53 1982 1 CMLR 499
GRIMALDI v FONDS DES MALADIES PROFESSIONNELLES 1989 ECR 4407 1991 2 CMLR 265 1990 IRLR 400
JONES JONES ON EXTRADITION 1ED 1995 PARA 5.012
JONES JONES ON EXTRADITION & MUTUAL ASSISTANCE 2ED 2001 PARA 10.018
FUGITIVE OFFENDERS ACT 1967 S3(1)(C) (UK)
EXTRADITION ACT 2003 S64(4) (UK)
FARRELL & HANRAHAN THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT IN IRELAND 2011 PARA 12.14
FARRELL & HANRAHAN THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT IN IRELAND 2011 PARA 12.16
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S16(8)
INTERPRETATION ACT 2005 S27(1)(C)
INTERPRETATION ACT 1937 S21(1)(C)
INTERPRETATION ACT 1978 S16(1)(C) (UK)
WILSON v FIRST COUNTY TRUST LTD (NO 2) 2004 1 AC 816 2003 3 WLR 568 2003 4 AER 97
WEST v GWYNNE 1911 2 CH 1
BENNION STATUTORY INTERPRETATION: A CODE 4ED 2002 259
GREENBERG CRAIES ON LEGISLATION 9ED 2008 PARA 14.4.12
CHIEF ADJUDICATION OFFICER & ANOR v MAGUIRE 1999 1 WLR 1778 1999 2 AER 859
EXTRADITION ACT 1965 S50(2)
AG v ABIMBOLA 2008 2 IR 302
INTERPRETATION ACT 1937 S22(2)
INTERPRETATION ACT 1937 S27(2)
EXTRADITION ACT 1965 S16
EXTRADITION ACT 1965 (PART II) (NO 1) ORDER 1966 SI 161/1966 ART 2(7)
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 13.6.2002 (EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003) ART 2(4)
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 13.6.2002 (EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003) ART 4(4)
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON EXTRADITION 13.12.1957 ART 26(3)
Judgment delivered on the 1st March, 2012 by Denham C.J.
Judgments delivered by all members of the Court
1. This appeal arises in unique circumstances and raises unprecedented questions of law.
2. A European Arrest Warrant, hereinafter referred to as "the warrant", was issued by the Republic of France and dated the 19 th February, 2010, in respect of Ian Bailey, the respondent/appellant, referred to as "the appellant". The warrant relates to the murder of Mme. Sophie Toscan du Plantier, a French citizen, on or about the 23 rd December, 1996, in Schull, County...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Minister for Justice v Busby
...issue on this appeal in light of the question certified. The decision in The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform v. Bailey [2012] IESC 16, is not of assistance to the issue in this case, as the matter for decision in this case did not arise for determination in Bailey. 16 Decision......
-
Minister for Justice and Equality v Bailey
...the Supreme Court divided by four to one in favour of Mr. Bailey. The case is reported as Minister for Justice and Equality v. Bailey at [2012] IESC 16 and [2012] 4 I.R. 1. The facts of the matter up to that date are extensively recited and may be found therein. I do not propose to recite ......
-
France (Republic) v. Diab, 2014 ONCA 374
...of France (2008), 2007-09 Gib. L.R. 191 (S.C. Gibraltar), dist. [para. 172]. Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform v. Bailey, [2012] IESC 16 (S.C. Ireland), dist. [para. 172]. Schreiber v. Canada (Attorney General), [2002] 3 S.C.R. 269; 292 N.R. 250; 164 O.A.C. 354; 2002 SCC 62, ref......
-
Min for Justice v O'Connor
...2011 941 ASSANGE v SWEDEN 2012 2 AC 471 2012 2 WLR 1275 2012 4 AER 1249 2012 UKSC 22 MIN FOR JUSTICE v BAILEY 2012 4 IR 1 2012/25/7268 2012 IESC 16 AIREY v IRELAND 1979-80 2 EHRR 305 1979 ECHR 3 CONSTITUTION ART 15.2.1 SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPT v PANKINA 2011 QB 376 2010 3 WLR 1......
-
The Forum Bar in UK Extradition Law: An Unnecessary Failure
...where anindividual is extradited subsequent to one being issued. That noted, in Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform v Bailey[2012] IESC 16 the Irish Supreme Court held that the decision not to prosecute Bailey for an alleged murder in Ireland of aFrench national did not preclude hi......