Minister for Social, Community and Family Affairs v Scanlon
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Judge | FENNELLY J. |
| Judgment Date | 16 January 2001 |
| Neutral Citation | [2001] IESC 1 |
| Docket Number | [1997 No. 277S, S.C. No. 136 of 1999] |
| Date | 16 January 2001 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
20 cases
-
DPP v Cawley
...39; [1994] 1 All E.R. 20; [1994] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 251; (1994) 138 S.J.L.B. 19. Minister for Social, Community and Family Affairs v. Scanlon [2001] I.R. 64. Mullins v. Harnett [1998] 4 I.R. 426; [1998] 2 I.L.R.M. 304. Murphy v. G.M. [2001] 4 I.R. 113. Nestor v. Murphy [1979] I.R. 326. Pepper v......
-
Dermot Hanrahan v Revenue Commissioners
...legislation and he relied on Hamilton v. Hamilton [1982] I.R. 466 and Minister for Social, Community and Family Affairs v. Scanlon [2001] 1 I.R. 64. 101 In addition, while the appellant accepted in oral submissions that no constitutional challenge could be mounted to either subs. (5A) or s.......
-
Re Lance Homes Ltd & The Companies Act; Lee Towers Management Company Ltd v Lance Investments Ltd ((in Liquidation))
...is unjust"', at p. 474. 43 The Supreme Court returned to the question in Minister for Social, Community and Family Affairs v. Scanlon [2001] 1 IR 64, and considered that the presumption against retrospective effect is not absolute and may be displaced by clear words of the statute. As stat......
-
Doherty v Government of Ireland
...East Donegal Co-operative Ltd v Attorney General [1970] IR 317 applied; Minister for Social Community and Family Affairs v Scanlon [2001] 1 IR 64 and Hanafin v Minister for the Environment [1996] 2 IR 321 followed - Electoral Act 1992 (No 23), s 39(2) - European Convention on Human Right......
Get Started for Free
