Moore and Others v Attorney-General and Others (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 01 July 1929 |
| Date | 01 July 1929 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Irish Free State) |
[S. C., I.F.S.]
Moore and Others
and
Attorney-General and Others (No. 2)
Security for costs - Application to the Supreme Court - Respondents in appeal to Supreme Court applying for order -Appellants the unsuccessful co-defendants of the Attorney-General - Attorney-General sued as representing the public - No appeal by Attorney-General - Competence of applicants' appeal -Position of Attorney-General - Poverty of appellants - Expense of action and appeal - Whether "special circumstances" justifying an order -Rules of the Supreme Court (Ir.), 1905, Or. LVIII, r. 15.
The plaintiffs brought an action for the purpose of establishing the title which they claimed to a several fishery in the tidal...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 cases
-
Incorporated Law Society of Ireland v Carroll
... ... Carroll| ATTORNEY GENERAL Functions Public - Rights - Enforcement - ... 2 IR 542 SOLICITORS ACT 1954 S77(1) MOORE V AG 1930 IR 471 SPUC V COOGAN 1990 ILRM 70 ... a service in regard to "compensation for injuries", that no fee is charged for advice, and that no fee is charged ... In the case of Moore and Others v. The Attorney General 1930 I.R. 471 , Kennedy C.J., ... ...
-
Edward Walsh and Another v County Council for County of Sligo
... ... /Respondent [2013] IESC 48 Appeal No. 089/2011 THE SUPREME COURT ... Blount v Layard [1891] 2 Ch 681; Simpson v Attorney General [1904] AC 476; Attorney General v Antrobus [1904] 2 Ch 188; ... Co Ltd v Attorney General (1898) 32 ILTR 95 ; Moore v Attorney General (No 2) [1930] 1 IR 471 ; Incorporated ... ; over a suburban garden (see Bruen v Murphy and others (High Court unreported 11 th March 1980)); or along a ... ...
-
SALTHILL PROPERTIES Ltd v ROYAL BANK of SCOTLAND Plc
...Comhlucht Páipéar Ríomhaireachta Teo v Udarás na Gaeltachta [1990] 1 IR 320, Pearson v Naydler [1977] 1 WLR 899 and Moore v AG (No2) [1929] IR 544 considered; Pitt v Bolger [1996] 1 IR 108, Maher v Phelan [1996] 1 IR 95, Proetta v Neil [1996] 1 IR 100, European Fashion Products Ltd v Ee......
-
Chris Gordon v The Irish Racehorse Trainers Association
...make such an order if the appeal involves an issue of law of general public importance ( Moore & ors. v. Attorney General & ors. (No. 2) [1929] IR 544). (iv) While poverty or insufficiency of assets on the part of an appellant is a necessary precondition to the making of such an order, it i......
Get Started for Free