Morrissey v Boyle
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1942 |
| Date | 01 January 1942 |
Evidence of mother of illegitimate child - Necessity for further evidence "corroborative in some material particular" -Sufficiency of such evidence - No express statement by mother that defendant was father of the child - Whether the facts sufficient to justify such an inference - Illegitimate Children (Affiliation Orders) Act, 1930 (No. 17 of 1930), s. 3, sub-s. 2.
-
Sect. 3, sub-s. 2, of the Illegitimate Children (Affiliation Orders) Act, 1930, provides: —"No Justice of the District Court shall be satisfied that a person is the putative father of an illegitimate child without hearing the evidence of the mother of such child and also evidence corroborative in some material particular or particulars of the evidence of such mother."Applicant brought a summons under the above Act against the defendant, B. She stated in evidence that on two occasions the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Walsh v Sligo County Council
...[1975] I.R. 1. M'Queen v. Great Western Railway Co. [1875] L.R. 10 Q.B. 569. Mann v. Brodie (1885) 10 App. Cas. 378. Morrissey v. Boyle [1942] I.R. 514; (1942) 75 I.L.T.R. 228. Moser v. Ambleside Urban District Council (1924) 89 J.P. 59; (1925) L.G.R. 533. Moser v. Ambleside Urban District ......
-
Edward Walsh and Another v County Council for County of Sligo
...AC 240; In re Ward of Court [1996] 2 IR 79; Bord na gCon v Murphy [1970] IR 301; The King v Lambe (1791) 2 Leach 552; Morrissey v Boyle [1942] IR 514; Woolway v Rowe (1834) 1 Ad & El 114; M'Kenna v Earl of Howth (1893) 27 ILTR 48; Evans v Merthyr Tydfil Urban District Council [1899] 1 Ch 2......
-
Walsh & Cassidy v Sligo County Council
...(1963) 49 M.P.R. 407.) 154 154. Admissions may also be made by conduct, both in the form of actions or omissions. In Morrissey v. Boyle [1942] I.R. 514, the Supreme Court considered circumstances where, following the birth of the applicant's child, a paternity issue arose. Sullivan C.J. not......