Moyne v The Londonderry Port and Harbour Commissioners

JurisdictionIreland
Judgment Date06 June 1986
Date06 June 1986
Docket Number[1982 No. 5956P]
CourtHigh Court
Moyne
and
The Londonderry Port and Harbour Commissioners
(H.C.)

Construction - Statutory duty - Harbour Commissioners - Pier vested in Commissioners - Powers - Duty to maintain pier - Power to make bye-laws - Power to appoint officer - Restriction on user of pier -Whether harbour master empowered to restrict user permanently - Whether Commissioners in breach of statutory duty - Locus standi -Whether plaintiffs members of class specifically benefited by statutes - Action for damages -Pecuniary loss - Harbours, Docks and Piers Clauses Act, 1847 (c. 127) - Londonderry Port and Harbour Acts, 1854 (c. 177), 1874 (c. 144) and 1882 (c. 162). Constitution - Personal rights - Right to earn a livelihood - Breach of statutory duty -Whether amounts to breach of constitutional rights - Constitution of Ireland, 1937, Art.40.3.1.

The Harbours, Docks and Piers Clauses Act, 1847, regulates the establishment and management of harbour commissioners generally and defines their powers and duties. Section 33 provides that the public, subject to defined conditions, shall have access to docks and piers maintained by the harbour commissioners. By the Londonderry Port and Harbour Acts, 1854, 1874 and 1882, being special private Acts subject to the general Act of 1847, the defendants were conferred with duties, inter alia, to maintain the docks and pier at Carrickarory, County Donegal. The defendants were empowered to restrict user of the pier through bye-laws subject to judicial approval. In addition, the harbour master, an officer appointed by the defendants, was empowered to give directions restricting user of the pier. The plaintiffs were coal distributors and imported their coal through Carickarory pier, vested by the special Acts in the defendants. By letter dated the 24 February, 1977, the defendants' harbour master gave notice that the pier "is now closed for discharging and loading of vessels until further notice." On the 22 August, 1980, the harbour master wrote to one of the plaintiffs announcing that the pier would be open from the 25 August to the 24 September, 1980, as a trial period, but that the type and manner of vessels loading and unloading would be restricted by four specified conditions. Use of the pier was extended beyond the trial period by further direction of the harbour master, but subject to the same restrictive conditions. The plaintiffs instituted proceedings in the High Court seeking a declaration that the closure of the pier and restriction on...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Atlantic Marine Supplies Ltd v Minister for Transport
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 19 July 2016
    ...by the legislature that an aggrieved plaintiff would be entitled to damages. Moyne v. Londonderry Port and Harbour Commissioners [1986] I.R. 299 and Sweeney v. Duggan[1991] 2 I.R. 274 considered. 2. That the only statutory obligation on the first defendant was to preclude the licensing of a......
  • Muldoon v The Minister for the Environment and Local Government
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 16 March 2023
    ...The right is not an unqualified right to any particular livelihood. 182 . In Moyne v. Londonderry Port & Harbour Commissioners [1986] IR 299 at pp. 316–7 Costello J. considered whether the infliction of a pecuniary loss established that an infringement of the right to earn a livelihood had ......
  • Sharda Sobhy v The Chief Appeals Officer, Minster for Employment Affairs and Social Protection, Ireland and The Attorney General
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 16 December 2021
    ...into the Act of 2005 a requirement that the contract be “legal”. It is argued by the appellants that the decision in Moyne v. Londonderry Port and Harbour Commissioners [1986] I.R. 299 was an example of a court finding by implication that a power carried a corresponding duty, an uncontrove......
  • Barlow v Minister for Communications
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 22 March 2019
    ...at p. 625: ‘[52] In relation to statutory duty per se it is clear from cases such as Moyne v. Londonderry Port and Harbour Commissioners [1986] I.R. 299 and Sweeney v. Duggan [1991] 2 I.R. 274 that the question of whether a plaintiff is entitled to claim damages for breach of statutory duty......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT