Murphy v Corporation of Dublin
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1976 |
| Date | 01 January 1976 |
| Docket Number | [1969 No. 538 P.] |
| Court | Supreme Court |
(S.C.)
Murphy
and
Corporation of Dublin
Land outside area of acquiring authority - Power of housing authority - Confirmation of compulsory purchase order - Housing Act, 1966 (No. 21), ss. 55, 76, 77, 109.
The plaintiff objected to a compulsory purchase order affecting his lands. The order was made by the defendant corporation as a housing authority and was confirmed by the second defendant pursuant to s. 76 of the Housing Act, 1966. The plaintiff's lands were not situated in the functional area of the defendant corporation. The person holding the public local inquiry prior to such confirmation had heard...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Clifford & Peter Sweetman v an Bord Pleanala ; O'Connor v an Bord Pleanala
...Realties Ltd. v. Ville de St. Michel [1924] AC 185 at 192, The People (A.G.) v. McGlynn [1967] I.R. 232, Murphy v. Dublin Corporation [1976] I.R. 143). 48 The context, language and purpose of the legislation all militate in favour of an interpretation that the new obligation to publish mate......
-
Pine Valley Developments v Minister for the Environment
...Borough Council) [1984] 1 W.L.R. 592; [1984] 1 All E.R. 956. Siney v. Dublin Corporation [1980] I.R. 400. Murphy v. Dublin Corporation [1976] I.R. 143. Lonhro Ltd. v. Shell Petroleum Co. Ltd. (No. 2) [1982] A.C. 173; [1981] 3 W.L.R. 33; [1981] 2 All E.R. 456. Johnston v. Meldon (1891) 30 L.......
-
Wymes v an Bord Pleanála
...an adjournment of the inquiry conducted by the inspector. Counsel refers, by reference to the decision inMurphy v. Corporation of Dublin [1976] I.R. 143, to the requirement that the Minister for Local Government who formerly exercised the power exercised by the Board was bound to act judici......
-
McNamee v Buncrana Urban District Council
...v. Feely (Supreme Court: 23rd July, 1980). 2 Moran v. Corporation of Dublin (1974) 109 I.L.T.R.57. 3 Murphy v. Corporation of Dublin [1976] I.R. 143. Local government - Housing - Allocation of houses - Housing authority's scheme of priorities - Categories of qualified applicants - Residence......
Get Started for Free