Murphy v Cronin

JurisdictionIreland
Judgment Date01 January 1968
Date01 January 1968
CourtSupreme Court
(S.C.)
Murphy
and
Cronin

Fatal accident -Damages - Deductions from damages -Civil Liability Act, 1961, s. 50.

The plaintiff's husband was killed when he rode a bicycle from a side road onto a main road where he was struck by a motor car driven by the defendant. The husband had not reached superannuation age but, by the rules of a superannuation fund of which he was a member, a sum equal to his accumulated contributions to the fund, with interest, was payable to his personal representative, and a sum equal to 25% of such contributions was payable to his widow, the plaintiff. The plaintiff brought an action, on behalf of herself and other dependants, against the defendant and claimed damages resulting from her husband's death. The action was tried in the High Court before a judge and jury. The jury found that the husband and the defendant had been negligent, that the husband had been 40% responsible and the defendant 60% responsible for the collision, and they awarded damages to the plaintiff. The defendant appealed against the finding that he had been negligent, against the apportionment of liability and against the amount of damages. In allowing the defendant's appeal against the apportionment of liability and dismissing the other grounds, it was held by the Supreme Court ( Ó Dálaigh C.J., Kingsmill Moore, Haugh and Walsh JJ.; Lavery J. dissenting) 1, that in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Fitzsimons v Telecom Éireann
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1991
    ...JENKINS 1913 AC 1 PYM V GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY CO 4 B & S 396 HULL V GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY CO OF IRELAND 26 LR (IR) 289 MURPHY V CRONIN 1966 IR 699 BYRNE V HOULIHAN 1966 IR 274 DAVIES V POWELL DUFFRYN ASSOCIATED COLLIERIES LTD 1942 AC 601 CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S49(1)(a) HAY V HUGHES ......
  • Carroll v Clare County Council
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 18 December 1975
    ...the light of the facts established by the evidence, and that 70% of the fault should be attributed to the plaintiff. Murphy v. CroninIR [1966] I.R. 699 and O'Learyv. O'ConnellIR [1968] I.R. 149 considered. 4. That, where a plaintiff claims compensation for (a) loss of earnings and/or (b) pa......
  • O'Sullivan v Córas Iompair Éireann
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 7 April 1978
    ...maximum of £1,000 damages for mental distress should also be added to the plaintiff's share of the damages awarded. Murphy v. CroninIR [1966] I.R. 699 considered. On appeal by the plaintiff it was Held by the Supreme Court (Henchy, Griffin and Parke JJ.), in disallowing the appeal, that th......
  • O'Sullivan v Córas Iompair Éireann
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 5 October 1976
    ...Éireann Anne O'Sullivan Plaintiff and Córas Iompair Éireann éireann Defendant Cases mentioned in this report:— 1 Murphy v. CroninIR [1966] I.R. 699. 2 Byrne v. HoulihanIR [1966] I.R. 274. 3 Franklin v. South Eastern Railway Co.ENR (1858) 3 H.&N. 211. 4 Dalton v. South Eastern RailwayENR (18......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT