Murray v Murray and Scanlon
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | High Court |
| Judgment Date | 13 July 1939 |
| Date | 13 July 1939 |
Money deposited payable "on the receipt or endorsement of them, or of any one or more of them" - Death of depositor - Claim by personal representative -Rebuttal of presumption of resulting trust -Whether a declaration of trust - Admissibility of evidence - Effect of requisition made in writing by depositor to the bank for the deposit receipt -Absolute assignment of a chose in action by depositor to the three persons named in deposit receipt - Express notice to the bank of the absolute assignment - Joint tenancy between the three persons named in deposit receipt - Severance of joint tenancy by death of depositor - Right of survivors to the fund - Legal character of the co-ownership of a chose in action represented by a deposit receipt.
J.M., an old man, returned from America to Donegal in 1926 with a sum of £300. He was received into the house of his nephew and niece, the defendants. From time...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Walsh v Walsh
...confirmed that it regards the six persons concerned as the owners of the winning ticket. I draw support by analogy from Murray v. Murray [1939] I.R. 317 for the conclusion that (if I am wrong about an express trust) a constructive trust does arise on the facts as to one-sixth of the winnin......
-
Grealish v Murphy
...without interest. (1) [1937] 4 All E. R. 34. (2) 3 Giff. 154. (3) L. R. 36 Ch. D. 145. (4) 2 Giff. 157. (5) L. R. 20 Eq. 328. (6) [1939] I. R. 317. (1) [1939] I. R. (2) [1940] I. R. 71. (3) 8 H. L. Cas. 481. (1) 15 Eq. 121. (1) 6 De G., M. & G. 424; 8 H. L. C. 481. (2) [1911] 1 Ch. 723. (1)......
-
Irish Commercial Society Ltd (in Liq.) v Plunkett (No 2)
...425 HAROLD WOOD BRICK CO LTD V FERRIS 1935 KB 198 WYLIE CONVEYENCING PARA 12.13 CONLON V CARLOW CO COUNCIL 1912 2 IR 541 MURRAY V MURRAY 1939 IR 317 GORRINGE V LAND IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY 1899 1 IR 142 WYLIE CONVEYANCING PARA 19.02 MORLEY V MORLEY 25 BEAV 253 JUDICATURE (IRL) ACT 1877 S28(6) F......