Murtagh Properties Ltd v Cleary
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 06 March 1972 |
| Date | 06 March 1972 |
| Docket Number | [1971. No. 4031 P.] |
| Court | High Court |
(H.C.)
Murtagh Properties Ltd
and
Cleary
Injunction - Public-house - Objection by trade union to employment of women - Whether prima facie evidence of facts establishing defendant's right to picket plaintiffs' premises - Equality before the law - Right to earn a livelihood - Trade Disputes Act, 1906 (6 Edw. 7, c. 47), ss. 2, 3, 5 - Constitution of Ireland, 1937, Articles 40, 45.
The defendant was the secretary of a trade union which represented bar waiters and others who were employed in public houses. The plaintiffs carried on business as publicans in a public house in Dublin and employed some...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
48 cases
-
Ighama v Minister for Justice
...ACT 1996 S12 REFUGEE ACT 1996 S16 REFUGEE ACT 1996 S16(10) CONSTITUTION ART 37.1 CONSTITUTION ART 15.2.1 MURTAGH PROPERTIES V CLEARY 1972 IR 330 REFUGEE ACT 1996 S3 ROONEY V MIN AGRICULTURE 1991 2 IR 539 DISEASES OF ANIMALS ACT 1966 S58 PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS V MIN ENVIRONMENT 1987 IR 2......
-
Madigan v Attorney General
...Louisville Gas and Electric Co v Coleman [1928] 277 US 32. Mulloy v Minister for Education [1975] IR 88. Murtagh Properties Ltd v Cleary [1972] IR 330. O’Brien v Keogh [1972] IR O’Brien v Manufacturing Engineering Co Ltd [1973] IR 334, 108 ILTR 105. O’Byrne v Minister for Finance [1959] IR ......
-
Parsons v Kavanagh
...SHELL PETROLEUM 1981 2 AER 456 RCA CORPORATION V POLLARD 1982 3 AER 771 AG V PAPERLINK LTD 1984 ILRM 373 MURTAGH PROPERTIES LTD V CLEARY 1972 IR 330 RYAN V AG 1965 IR 294 YEATES V MIN FOR POSTS & TELEGRAPHS UNREP HIGH 21.2.1978 1981/8/1406 MURPHY V STEWART 1973 IR 97 BYRNE V IRELAND 197......
- State (Donegal v.E.C.) v Minister for Education
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Whither Constitutional Environmental (Rights) Protection In Ireland After ?Climate Case Ireland'?
...Article 45, stated that he shared Hogan J’s concerns about the 132 Hogan and others (n 99) 2518. 133 Murtagh Properties v Cleary [1972] IR 330 (HC). See Gerry Whyte, Social Inclusion and the Legal System: Public Interest Law in Ireland (IPA 2015). 134 Adelmant (n 2). 135 [2017] IEHC 456. 13......
-
Official indifference and persistent procrastination: an analysis of Sinnott
...17 December 2001). 90 T.D. v. Minister for Education (Supreme Court, unreported, 17 December 2001). 91 Murtagh Properties Ltd. v. Cleary [1972] I.R. 330. See Hogan, “Directive Principles, Socio-Economic Rights and the Constitution”, 2002] An Analysis of Sinnott 188 principles are not cognis......
-
An Audit of Fair Procedures within the GAA: The Impetus for Change of the GAA's Disciplinary Rules Provided by the Na Fianna Action
...- How has it Contributed to the Development of Sports Law" (1997) 5(3) Sport and Law Journal 5. 74 See, Murtagh Properties v. Cleary [1972] IR 330, Murphy v. Stewart [1973] IR 97, AG v. Paperlink [1984] ILRM 373, In Re Article 26 and the Employment Equality Bill, 1996 [1997] 2 IR 321. The r......
-
Ireland's Magdalene laundries and the State's failure to protect
...General , supra note 136 140 Judgment of Walsh J in McGee v Attorney General , supra note 136 141 Murtagh Properties Ltd. v Cleary [1972] I.R. 330 142 Report of the Constitution Review Group, supra note 135, p.250; see Desmond v Glackin [1992] ILRM 49 143 Ryan v Attorney General , supra not......
Get Started for Free