O'Neill v Ryan
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1993 |
| Date | 01 January 1993 |
(S.C.)
(H.C.)
O'Neill
and
Ryan (No. 1)
- Rule in Foss v. Harbottle - European Community - Alleged breach of competition rules - Former shareholder allegedly suffering damage by reason of reduction in share value - Whether rule in Foss v. Harbottle applicable - Whether shareholder able to bring a personal claim against a party causing damage to a company - Whether EC law provides shareholder with cause of action -EEC Treaty, Arts. 85, 86. Practice - Action -Application to strike out - Whether reasonable cause of action disclosed - Whether claim clearly unsustainable - Rules of the Superior Courts, 1986, O. 19, r. 28.
The plaintiff claimed damages and other relief for breach of contract and wrongful dismissal against the first and second named defendants. The plaintiff also made...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
46 cases
-
Ennis v Butterly
... 1981 IR 306 GOODSON V GRIERSON 1908 1 KB 761 SUN FAT CHAN V OSSEOUS LTD 1992 1 IR 425 K (D) V K (A) 1993 ILRM 710 O'NEILL V RYAN 1993 ILRM 557 WILSON V CARNLEY 1908 1 KB 729 SPEARS V HUNT 1908 1 KB 720 SIVEYER V ALLISON 1935 2 KB 403 MARVIN V MARVIN 1976 18 CAL 3d 660 MORONE V MORONE......
-
Superwood Holdings Plc v Ireland
...2000 NI CHD 477 KAVANAGH v GOVERNOR OF MOUNTJOY PRISON & ORS 2002 3 IR 97 BARRY v BUCKLEY 1981 IR 306 1981/9/1485 O'NEILL v RYAN & ORS 1993 ILRM 557 1993/5/1227 LAC MINERALS LTD v CHEVRON MINERAL CORP OF IRELAND & ORS 1995 1 ILRM 161 1994/11/3344 SUPERMACS (IRL) LTD & MCDONAGH v KATESAN ......
-
P. O'D v A. O'D
...Consist Rep. 310. N. (C) v. N (R) [1995] 1 Fam. L.J. 14. Olympia Productions Ltd. v. Mackintosh [1992] I.L.R.M. 204. O'Neill v. Ryan [1993] I.L.R.M. 557. Sullivan v. Sullivan 2 Addams 299. Wilson v. Wilson (1848) 1 H.L.C. 538. Family law - Judicial separation - Ancillary relief - Nature of ......
-
Landers v Garda Síochána Complaints Board
...MACKMAN 1983 2 AC 237 BARRY V BUCKLEY 1981 IR 306 SUN FAT CHAN V OSSEOUS LTD 1992 1 IR 425 K (D) V K (A) 1993 ILRM 710 O'NEILL V RYAN 1993 ILRM 557 PROSECUTION OF OFFENCES ACT 1974 MCCORMACK, STATE V CURRAN 1987 ILRM 225 H V DPP 1994 1 IR 589 GARDA SIOCHANA (COMPLAINTS) ACT 1986 S7(5) S......
Get Started for Free