Nolan v Cullen
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 11 February 1901 |
| Date | 11 February 1901 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ireland) |
Q. B. Div.
Appeal.
CASES
DETERMINED BY
THE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
OF
THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN IRELAND,
AND ON APPEAL THEREFROM IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL,
AND BY
THE COURT FOR CROWN CASES RESERVED.
1901.
Practice — Civil bill — Ejectment for overholding — Transfer of matter to Superior Court — 37 & 38 Vict. c. 66.
A civil bill ejectment for overholding may be ordered to be brought up and tried in the Queen's Bench Division under 37 & 36 Vict c. 66.
The words “action of ejectment upon the title” in 40 & 41 c. 56, s. 54, include actions of ejectment for overholding.
Adjourned Summons, under the 37 & 38 Vict. c. 66, sect. 2, which the defendant issued by leave of Johnson, J., in the vacation, calling upon the plaintiff to show cause why the civil bill ejectment for overholding in this matter should not be tried in the Queen's Bench Division. The grounds upon which the transfer was sought were—1, that the title to lands or hereditaments of a greater annual value than £30 would be affected by the decision in the action; 2, that the premises sought to be recovered with the buildings erected thereon were of a saleable value of at least £800, and 3, that the questions and issues involved in the action were of such difficulty and importance as regards both law and fact as to render the action wholly unfit to be tried in the County Court. The summons further suggested that the Judge, if he thought expedient, might upon such terms as he should consider proper to impose, order that the civil bill proceedings should be discontinued and that the action should be tried in the Queen's Bench Division. The defendant, Frederick F. Cullen, was the proprietor of a training establishment known as Rossmore Lodge, Currragh, county Kildare, and was the owner of race horses. On the 31st December, 1900, he was served with a civil bill ejectment for overholding at the suit of the plaintiff, Bridget Nolan, seeking to recover from him possession of part of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Bank of Ireland v Lady Lisa Ireland Ltd
...& TENANT LAW AMDT ACT IRL 1860 KEATING V MULCAHY 1926 IR 214 ARDEN V BOYCE 1894 1 QB 796 MEARES V CONNOLLY 1930 IR 333 NOLAN V CULLEN 1901 2 IR 628 FITZSIMONS V PARKER 1949 IJ 59 THOMPSON V O'NEILL 90 ILTR 73 SWEENEY V POWERSCOURT SHOPPING CENTRE 1985 ILRM 442 RSC O.37 r7 RSC O.37 r11 R......
-
Lloyd and Dunne v Brown
...is given in the headnote. (1) 16 Ir. L. T. & Sol. Journ. p. 97. (2) 14 Ch. D. 492. (3) [1929] I. R. 351. (4) I. R. 5 C. L. p. 302. (5) [1901] 2 I. R. 628. (1) [1929] I. R. ...
-
Gillman v Bourke and Others
...C. (1) Before Madden and Kenny, JJ. (1) The material portion of the section is set out in the judgment of Madden, J.,post, p. 100. (2) [1901] 2 I. R. 628. (3) 5 Bligh, 31; 2 Dow & Cl. (4) 9 I. L. R. 514. (1) [1901] 2 I. R. 628. (2) 1 Ridgeway, 384. (1) [1901] 2 I. R. 628. should be held to ......
-
Fitzsimons v Parker and Others
...to the Circuit Court Rules (1930)) or of an "ejectment civil-bill for overholding"(form No. 2c of the said forms). Nolan v. Cullen [1901] 2 I.R. 628, applied. ...