Orange Ltd v Director of Telecoms (No 2)
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judge | Keane C.J.,Mr Justice Francis D Murphy,BARRON J.,Mr. Justice Geoghegan |
| Judgment Date | 18 May 2000 |
| Neutral Citation | [2000] IESC 22 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Docket Number | [S.C. Nos. 224 & 278 of 1999 and 14 of 2000],224 & 278 /1999 & 14/2000 224/99 |
| Date | 18 May 2000 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
158 cases
-
Galway City Council v Samuel Kingston Construction Ltd and Another
... 1999 1 ILRM 401 ORANGE COMMUNICATIONS LTD v DIRECTOR OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATION & METEOR MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS LTD (NO 2) 2000 4 IR 159 2000/15/5538 CARRICKDALE HOTEL LTD v CONTROLLER OF PATENTS DESIGNS & TRADE MARKS & PHONOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE (IRL) LTD 2004 3 IR 410 HUDSON & DUNCA......
-
Kelly v Minister for Agriculture
...and not prior to, or extraneous to it. Thus, the claim of bias was unsustainable (See Orange Limited v. Director of Telecoms (No. 2) [2000] 4 I.R. 159, Barron J.). The appeal court held that, even had there been grounds for a finding of either form of bias, any taint or flaw was rectified ......
-
Glancré Teoranta v Seamus Cafferkey
...I.R. 230;Esat Digifone Ltd. v. South Dublin County Council [2002] 3 I.R. 585 followed.Orange Ltd. v. Director of Telecoms (No. 2)[2000] 4 I.R. 159distinguished. 3. That, in exercising its discretion as to whether further evidence should be admitted on an appeal, the High Court should adopt ......
-
O'Callaghan v Mahon
...LTD v IRELAND 1995 1 ILRM 408 1994 9 2704 R v SUSSEX JUSTICES EX PARTE MCCARTHY 1924 1 KB 256 ORANGE LTD v DIRECTOR OF TELECOMS (NO 2) 2000 4 IR 159 SPIN COMMUNICATIONS LTD T/A STORM FM v INDEPENDENT RADIO & TELEVISION COMMISSION (IRTC) & MAYPRIL LTD 2001 4 IR 411 2002 1 ILRM 98 2001 23......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Data Matters: Data Protection Issues
...Data Protection Act 2018. 58 S. 150(2) Data Protection Act 2018, s.150(6) Data Protection Act 2018. 59 [2016] IESC 18. 60 ibid [30]. 61 [2000] 4 IR 159 184-185. [2022] Irish Judicial Studies Journal Vol 6(2) 59 IRISH JUDICIAL STUDIES JOURNAL 59 This test was subsequently approved by Finnega......
-
The Commercial Court by Stephen Dowling
...procedures that are involved when litigating in the Commercial Court”, and to provide a “broader analysis of the role that case manage- 6 [2000] 4 IR159 7 Clarke J, High Court, unreported, 3 August 2005 8 Kelly J, High Court, unreported, 14 July 2006 9 Kelly J, High Court, unreported, 3 Dec......