Orange Ltd v Director of Telecoms (No 2)

JurisdictionIreland
JudgeKeane C.J.,Mr Justice Francis D Murphy,BARRON J.,Mr. Justice Geoghegan
Judgment Date18 May 2000
Neutral Citation[2000] IESC 22
CourtSupreme Court
Docket Number[S.C. Nos. 224 & 278 of 1999 and 14 of 2000],224 & 278 /1999 & 14/2000 224/99
Date18 May 2000
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
158 cases
  • Galway City Council v Samuel Kingston Construction Ltd and Another
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 25 March 2010
    ... 1999 1 ILRM 401 ORANGE COMMUNICATIONS LTD v DIRECTOR OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATION & METEOR MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS LTD (NO 2) 2000 4 IR 159 2000/15/5538 CARRICKDALE HOTEL LTD v CONTROLLER OF PATENTS DESIGNS & TRADE MARKS & PHONOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE (IRL) LTD 2004 3 IR 410 HUDSON & DUNCA......
  • Kelly v Minister for Agriculture
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 30 March 2021
    ...and not prior to, or extraneous to it. Thus, the claim of bias was unsustainable (See Orange Limited v. Director of Telecoms (No. 2) [2000] 4 I.R. 159, Barron J.). The appeal court held that, even had there been grounds for a finding of either form of bias, any taint or flaw was rectified ......
  • Glancré Teoranta v Seamus Cafferkey
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 24 June 2004
    ...I.R. 230;Esat Digifone Ltd. v. South Dublin County Council [2002] 3 I.R. 585 followed.Orange Ltd. v. Director of Telecoms (No. 2)[2000] 4 I.R. 159distinguished. 3. That, in exercising its discretion as to whether further evidence should be admitted on an appeal, the High Court should adopt ......
  • O'Callaghan v Mahon
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 30 March 2007
    ...LTD v IRELAND 1995 1 ILRM 408 1994 9 2704 R v SUSSEX JUSTICES EX PARTE MCCARTHY 1924 1 KB 256 ORANGE LTD v DIRECTOR OF TELECOMS (NO 2) 2000 4 IR 159 SPIN COMMUNICATIONS LTD T/A STORM FM v INDEPENDENT RADIO & TELEVISION COMMISSION (IRTC) & MAYPRIL LTD 2001 4 IR 411 2002 1 ILRM 98 2001 23......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Data Matters: Data Protection Issues
    • Ireland
    • Irish Judicial Studies Journal No. 2-22, July 2022
    • 1 July 2022
    ...Data Protection Act 2018. 58 S. 150(2) Data Protection Act 2018, s.150(6) Data Protection Act 2018. 59 [2016] IESC 18. 60 ibid [30]. 61 [2000] 4 IR 159 184-185. [2022] Irish Judicial Studies Journal Vol 6(2) 59 IRISH JUDICIAL STUDIES JOURNAL 59 This test was subsequently approved by Finnega......
  • The Commercial Court by Stephen Dowling
    • Ireland
    • Hibernian Law Journal No. 7-2007, January 2007
    • 1 January 2007
    ...procedures that are involved when litigating in the Commercial Court”, and to provide a “broader analysis of the role that case manage- 6 [2000] 4 IR159 7 Clarke J, High Court, unreported, 3 August 2005 8 Kelly J, High Court, unreported, 14 July 2006 9 Kelly J, High Court, unreported, 3 Dec......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT