People (Attorney General) v McGlynn
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 24 July 1967 |
| Date | 24 July 1967 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
(S.C.)
People (Attorney General)
and
McGlynn
Whether statute repugnant to Constitution - Whether case may be stated during course of criminal trial by jury - Courts of Justice Act, 1947, s. 16 - Constitution of Ireland, Art. 34, s. 4, (3).
The accused was charged in the Circuit Court with having committed certain criminal offences. At the conclusion of the evidence, and before the jury's verdict, the Circuit Judge stated a consultative case under s. 16 of the Courts of Justice Act, 1947, referring a...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
47 cases
-
Menton v Director for Public Prosecutions
...ON HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 6 BYRNE v DPP UNREP PEART 22.7.2005 2005/7/1424 DPP v ARTHURS 2000 2 ILRM 363 DPP v MCGLYNN 1967 IR 232 DPP v SPECIAL CRIMINAL COURT & WARD 1999 1 IR 60 CRIMINAL LAW: Delay District Court - Summary jurisdiction - Applicant brought to trial two y......
-
Tracey v Malone
...if necessary upon an appeal (para. 11; see, DPP v. Special Criminal Court [1999] 1 I.R. 60 and The People (Attorney General) v. McGlynn [1967] 1 I.R. 232). 9 Cooke J. made clear that in the McGlynn case, Ó Dálaigh C.J. pointed out that the nature of a criminal trial was such that, once it s......
-
DPP v MS
...Ó Laighléis ó laighléis [1960] I.R. 93; (1957) 95 I.L.T.R. 92. I. O'T. v. B. [1998] 2 I.R. 321. The People (Attorney General) v. McGlynn [1967] I.R. 232. The People v. Lynch [1982] I.R. 64; [1981] I.L.R.M. 389. The People v. O'Shea [1982] I.R. 384; [1983] I.L.R.M. 549. The People (Director ......
-
Eamon Cruise v Judge Frank O'Donnell and DPP
...the principle of the unitary nature of a criminal trial as laid down in a number of authorities. The People (Attorney General) v McGlynn [1967] IR 232, Corporation of Dublin v Flynn [1980] IR 357 and DPP v Special Criminal Court & Paul Ward [1999] 1 IR 60 were cited. 45 Considerations and c......
Get Started for Free