People (Attorney-General) v Murphy
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 23 January 1947 |
| Date | 23 January 1947 |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
(C.C.A.),
The People (Attorney-General)
and
Murphy
Evidence - Statements by accused - Improper inducement - Caution prior to statement - Duty of trial Judge to be judicially satisfied that inducement had ceased to operate on mind of accused before statement made - Statement made in answer to questions by police officer -Whether ipso facto inadmissible - Expression "you are all right" meaning "you will be all right" - Whether an improper inducement -Onus on prosecution to establish that statement is voluntary.
During investigations into a murder, the accused...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
People (Attorney-General) v Galvin
...made at 12.15 a.m. R. v. Johnston15 Ir. C.L.R. 60; Attorney-General v. M'CabeIR[1927] I.R. 129 and People (Attorney-General)v. MurphyIR [1947] I.R. 236 approved. People (Attorney-General) v. C.DIJR [1943] Ir. Jur. Rep. 74 not approved. The People (Attorney General) v. Galvin. THE PEOPLE (At......
-
People v Kelly (No. 2)
...v. Galvin [1964] I.R. 325. 27 The People (Attorney General) v. C. [1943] Ir. Jur. Rep. 74. 28 The People (Attorney General) v. Murphy [1947] I.R. 236. 29 The People (Attorney General) v. Manning (1954) 89 I.L.T.R. 155. 30 The Attorney-General v. McCabe [1927] I.R. 129. 31 R. v. Middleton [1......
-
H (T) v DPP & Judge Smithwick
...If that had not been the position it is quite clear that no relief would have been granted. See also The People (A.G) v. Murphy 1947 I.R. 236, where once again the central issue was the exclusion of a statement obtained by an improper inducement. 141 41. In addition to these Irish cases, I ......
-
People (Attorney General) v Cummins
...2 [1964] I.R. 325. 3 [1958] 1 W.L.R. 140. 4 [1947] K.B. 297. 5 [1952] 2 Q.B. 911. 6 (1898) 19 Cox C.C. 16. 7 (1864) 15 I.C.L.R. 60. 8 [1947] I.R. 236. 9 (1864) 15 I.C.L.R. 60. 10 [1964] I.R. 325. 11 [1965] I.R. 142. 12 [1927] I.R. 129. 13 (1931) 23 Cr. App. R. 56. 14 (1911) 76 J.P. 191. 15 ......