Perry v Stratham, Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 30 July 1928 |
| Date | 30 July 1928 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Irish Free State) |
S. C.,
Perry
and
Stratham, Ltd.
Application to the Supreme Court - Respondent in an appeal to Supreme Court applying for order - Appellant resident in England - Jurisdiction of Supreme Court - "Special circumstances" entitling a respondent to an order - Rules of the Supreme Court (Ireland), 1905, Or. LVIII., r. 15.
An unsuccessful plaintiff in an action tried in the High Court for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him through the negligence of the defendants served...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
23 cases
-
Framus Ltd v CRH Plc
...IRELAND FINANCE LTD 1992 2 IR 57 RSC O.29 COMPANIES ACT 1908 S278 SEE CO LTD V PUBLIC LIGHTING SERVICES 1987 ILRM 255 PERRY V STRATHAM 1928 IR 580 FANNON V AN BORD PLEANALA 1992 2 IR 380 1 Murray, J. delivered on the 22nd day of April, 2 The plaintiffs, who are the appellants in these p......
-
West Donegal Land League Ltd v Udaras Na Gaeltachta
...15/5/2006)[2006] IESC 29, [2007] 1 ILRM 1 West Donegal Land League Ltd v Údarás naGaeltachta COMPANIES ACT 1963 S390 PERRY v STRATHAM LTD 1928 IR 580 FALLON v BORD PLEANALA 1992 2 IR 380 MALAHIDE COMMUNITY COUNCIL LTD v FINGAL CO COUNCIL 1997 3 IR 383 HOUSTON v UDARAS NA GAELTACHTA & ORS......
-
Irish Press Plc v Warburg Pincus Company International Ltd
...& ANOR V BRODRENE GRAM A/S UNREP COSTELLO 21.7.94 1994/8/2243 BEAUCROSS LTD V KENNEDY UNREP MORRIS 18.10.95 1995/15/3854 PERRY V STRAITHAM 1928 IR 580 Synopsis: Practice & Procedure S.390 Companies Act 1963; security for costs; whether funds available to meet costs if payable Held: Applica......
-
Coolbrook Developments Ltd v Lington Development Ltd
...that part of the judgment of Kingsmill Moore J. in the case which referred to the earlier dicta of Fitzgibbon J. in Perry v. Stratham [1928] I.R. 580 ('Perry'). There, Fitzgibbon J stated: ' It must be borne in mind that security is not intended either as an indemnity against all costs whic......
Get Started for Free