Rabbitt v Grant [Supreme Court.]

JurisdictionIreland
Judgment Date19 February 1940
Date19 February 1940
CourtSupreme Court
(S.C.),
Rabbitt
and
Grant

Permitted increases -Premises structurally altered to abate nuisance -Increase of rent claimed for "improvement or structural alteration" - Whether alterations were also repairs - Whether increase allowable -Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest (Restrictions) Act, 1923 (No. 19 of 1923), s. 8. sub-ss. 1 (a) and 5.

  1. Sect. 8 of the Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest (Restrictions) Act, 1923, provides: —"8. —(1) The amount by which the increased rent of a dwelling-house to which this Act applies may exceed the standard rent shall, subject the provisions of this Act, be as follows, that is to say: —(a) Where the landlord has since the 4th day of August 1914, incurred, or hereafter incurs, expenditure on the improvement or structural alteration of the dwelling-house (not including expenditure on decoration or repairs), an amount calculated at a rate per annum not exceeding . . . 8 per cent of the amount so expended: . . . (5) For the purposes of this section, the expression 'repairs' means any repairs required for the purpose of keeping premises in good and tenantable repair, and any premises in such a state shall be deemed to be in a reasonable state of repair, and the landlord shall be deemed to be responsible for any repairs for which the tenant is under no express liability or liability implied under s. 42 of the Landlord and Tenant Law Amendment Act (Ir.), 1860." M. was the landlord and R.the statutory tenant, under the Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest (Restrictions) Act, 1923, of a dwelling-house provided with an earth privy ad sole sanitary convenience. M. was served with a notice by the sanitary authority under the Public Health (Ir.) Act, 1878, informing him that a nuisance existed on the premises through the want of proper sanitary accommodation and requiring him within three months to instal a water-closet. M. installed a water-closet within this period and subsequently served notice on R. that the rent of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • J B Vale (Inspector Of Taxes) v Martin Mahony & Brothers Limited
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 13 Diciembre 1945
    ...Highland Railway Co v Balderston 26 SC LR 657, 2 TC 485. Inland Revenue Commissioners v Lysaght 13 TC 511, [1928] AC 234. Rabbitt v Grant [1940] IR 323. Rhodesia Railways Ltd v Collector of Income Tax, Bechuanaland Portectorate [1933] AC Robert Addie & Sons’ Colliers Ltd v Commissioners of ......
  • Morcom v Campbell-Johnson
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 6 Octubre 1955
    ... ... [1955] EWCA Civ J1006-3 In The Supreme Court of Judicature Court of Appeal ... Lord Justice Denning, ... In Wates case there was considered the Irish case of Rabbitt v. Grent and also the earlier case in this Court of strood , to which ... ...
  • Wates v Rowland
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
  • Vale v Mahony and Brothers Ltd
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 13 Diciembre 1947
    ...to Cases I and II of Schedule D. The appeal should be allowed. O'Byrne J. :— I agree, and have nothing to add. (1) 10 T.C. 155. (2) 74 I. L. T. R. 76. (1) S. E. Leaflet (2) 8 T. C. 671. (3) 14 T. C. 479. (4) 15 T. C. 761. (5) 10 T. C. 155. (6) 19 T. C. 390. (1) 15 T. C. 761. (2) [1926] I. R......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT