Re Interview Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 07 March 1975 |
| Date | 07 March 1975 |
| Docket Number | [1973 No. 150 Sp.] |
| Court | High Court |
Equitable assignment -Goods in company's possession - Goods sold to company under contract reserving property to seller - Whether goods captured by debenture -Assignment of company's chose in action not registered - Debenture registered - Factors Act, 1889 (52 53 Vict., c. 45), ss. 2, 9 - Sale of Goods Act, 1893 (56 57 Vict. c. 71), s. 25 -Companies Act, 1963 (No. 33), s. 99.
An Irish company, EII, agreed with a German company, AEG, to import AEG goods under a contract governed by German law; by that contract AEG reserved to itself the property in the goods until payment for them had been completed, and EII agreed to assign to AEG any claims that EII might acquire against persons to whom EII sold AEG goods. Subsequently, it was arranged that another Irish company, Interview Ltd., should acquire from EII its stock of AEG goods, and that Interview should be supplied directly by AEG with its goods upon the same conditions as applied to the supply of AEG goods to EII. Possession of the AEG goods...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Re Hickey (W.J.) Ltd
...Clough Mill Ltd. v. Martin [1984] 1 W.L.R. 1067; [1984] 1 All E.R. 721; [1985] 1 W.L.R. 111; [1984] 3 All E.R. 982. In re Interview Ltd. [1975] I.R. 382. Kruppstahl A.G. v. Quitman Products Ltd. [1982] I.L.R.M. 551. Re Andrabell Ltd. [1984] 3 All E.R. 407. Sale of goods - Property - Transfe......
-
Re JD Brian Ltd ((in Liquidation)) and Others
...B.S. [1998] 1 W.L.R. 896; [1998] 1 All E.R. 98; [1998] 1 B.C.L.C. 493. Illingworth v. Houldsworth [1904] A.C. 355. In re Interview Ltd. [1975] I.R. 382. In re Keenan Bros. Ltd. [1985] I.R. 401; [1985] I.L.R.M. 254, 641; [1986] B.C.L.C. 242. In re Lewis Merthyr Consolidated Collieries [1929]......
-
Governor and Company of The Bank of Ireland v Eteams International Ltd
...subsequent to a sale by Bourkes is in substance - though not in terms - the same as that which existed in In re Interview Ltd. [1975] I.R. 382 in that effectively Bourkes were creating or conferring a charge on the proceeds of sale in substitution for the right of property which Carrolls h......
-
Latzur Ltd ((in Receivership)) v The Companies Act 2014
...of the charged assets to the debenture holder has long been understood the law in this jurisdiction: see e.g. In Re Interview Ltd [1975] IR 382 11 In In re Brightlife Ltd [1987] 1 Ch 200, Hoffman J referred to the decision of the House of Lords in Government Stock and Other Securities Inve......