Re Kennedy and McCann
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Judgment Date | 07 July 1976 |
| Docket Number | [S.C. No. 142 of 1975] |
| Date | 07 July 1976 |
(S.C.)
In re Kennedy and McCann
Scandalising the court - Rules of the Superior Courts, 1962 (S.I. No. 72), Or. 44.
The mother of two boys brought proceedings in the High Court under the Guardianship of Infants Act, 1964, and on the 6th June, 1975, that court awarded the sole custody of the boys to their father, who was a defendant in those proceedings. The proceedings, and prior proceedings of the same nature, had been heard in camera as permitted by s. 45 of the Courts (Supplemental Provisions) Act, 1961. The mother...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
15 cases
-
Weeland v Raidió Teilifís Éireann
...limits of reasonable criticism and accordingly the criticisms alleged did not amount to contempt of court. In re Kennedy and McCannIR [1976] I.R. 382 applied. 3. That furthermore the plaintiff had failed to establish that he was prejudiced in the presentation of his defence to the High Cour......
-
Herrity v Associated Newspapers (Ireland) Ltd
...v UK [1981] 4 EHRR149, Meskell v CIÉ [1973] IR121, Conway v INTO [1991] 2 IR 305, M v Drury [1994] 2 IR 8, Re Kennedy and McCann [1976] IR 382, Argyll (Duchess) v Argyll (Duke) [1967] Ch 302 and X v Flynn (Unrep, Costello J, 19/5/1994) considered; Shortt v Commissioner of An Garda Síochá......
-
State (DPP) v Walsh
...[1977] I.R. 360. 36 The King v. Dolan [1907] 2 I.R. 260. 37 The State (Browne) v. Feran [1967] I.R. 147. 38 In re Kennedy and McCann [1976] I.R. 382. 39 Stradling v. Morgan (1560) 1 Plowd. 199. 40 Cox v. Hakes (1890) 15 A.C. 306. 41 Attorney General v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [1974] A.C. 273.......
-
Kelly v O'Neill
...JUSTICES 1924 1 KB 256 D V DPP 1994 2 IR 465 Z V DPP 1994 2 IR 476 AG V X 1992 1 IR 1 R V GREY 1900 2 QB 36 KENNEDY & MCCANN, IN RE 1976 IR 382 DPP, PEOPLE V CONROY 1986 IR 460 AG V BBC 1981 AC 303 LONRHO PLC, IN RE 1990 2 AC 154 DESMOND V GLACKIN 1992 ILRM 490 WONG V MIN FOR JUST......
Get Started for Free
