Re Singer [No. 2]
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1964 |
| Date | 01 January 1964 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
(S.C.)
In re Singer [No. 2]
Second order of habeas corpus made - Accused immediately rearrested -Further charges preferred - Depositions taken and accused remanded in custody - Subsequent information and warrant of arrest - Prosecutor arrested thereunder - Whether lawfully in custody.
S. was charged with various offences of fraud. He was arrested on 30th May, 1959, and the taking of depositions commenced on 24th August, 1959. Informations were received against him on 23rd January, 1960, and he was returned for trial. No indictment having been presented, S. sought and obtained a conditional order of habeas corpus which was ultimately made absolute on 25th May, 1960, by the Supreme Court. S., in pursuance of the order of the Supreme Court, was released from Mountjoy Prison on 25th May, 1960. Immediately...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
36 cases
-
Doran & Gilbert v District Judge Reilly & Judges of the Eastern Circuit
...CREAVEN v CRIMINAL ASSETS BUREAU 2004 4 IR 434 QUINN v CORP OF DUBLIN 1878 2 LR IR 371 BYRNE v GREY 1988 IR 31 SINGER (NO 2), IN RE 1964 98 ILTR 112 HENDERSON v HENDERSON 1843 3 HARE 100 A (A) v MEDICAL COUNCIL 2003 4 IR 302 MCK (F) v H (T) 2007 4 IR 186 COX v DUBLIN CITY DISTILLERY (NO......
-
State (O'Connell) v Fawsitt
...[1976] I.R. 325; (1976) 112 I.L.T.R. 37. The State (O'Callaghan) v. O hUadhaigh [1977] I.R. 42. In the Matter of Paul Singer (No. 2) (1960) 98 I.L.T.R. 112. In re Criminal Law (Jurisdiction) Bill, 1975 [1977] I.R. 129; (1976) 110 I.L.T.R. 69. In re Singer (No. 1) (1960) 97 I.L.T.R. 130. D.P......
-
Glavin v Governor of Mountjoy Prison
...ACT 1967 S8 COURTS OF JUSTICE (DISTRICT COURT) ACT 1949 S2 SHELLY V MAHON & DPP 1990 IR 36 PEOPLE V BOGGAN 1958 IR 62 SINGER, IN RE (NO 2) 98 ILTR 112 CONSTITUTION ART 38.1 COURTS (NO 2) ACT 1988 S1(2)(a) COURTS (NO 2) ACT 1988 S1(3) O'SHEA V DPP 1988 IR 655 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 1967196......
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Carter
...to comply with the provision may give rise to the possibility that the accused would achieve what Walsh J. In Re Singer (No. 2) (1964) 98 I.L.T.R. 112 called the "immunity of a juristic limbo". 69 16. What, for example, is the position where a person is about to be sentenced and section 99(......
Request a trial to view additional results