S.A. v Refugees Appeal Tribunal
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judge | Mr. Justice Kevin Cross |
| Judgment Date | 01 March 2012 |
| Neutral Citation | [2012] IEHC 101 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [2012] 3 JIC 0103 |
| Court | High Court |
| Date | 01 March 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 cases
-
Re Thirty First Amdt of the Constitution (Children) Bill 2012
...114 CONSTITUTION ART 16.2.3 CONSTITUTION ART 40.1 CONSTITUTION ART 40.3 A (S) v REFUGEE APPEAL TRIBUNAL UNREP CROSS 1.3.2012 2012/1/106 2012 IEHC 101 REFERENDUM ACT 1994 S42 RSC O.97 r3(4) HANAFIN v MIN FOR THE ENVIRONMENT 1996 2 IR 321 ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS (TRAFFICKING) ACT 2000 S5 PLANNING......
-
Joanna Jordan v Minister for Children and Youth Affairs and Others
...distribution of the booklets, the use of the website and the advertising campaign. In an ex tempore judgment on 1st November, Kearns P. [2012] IEHC 101 considered an extensive body of expert and other evidence submitted on affidavit, but was not satisfied to conclude that the material in qu......
- F.T. v Refugee Appeals Tribunal
-
NSM [Zimbabwe] v Minister for Justice
...as follows: ‘In the context of asylum law this matter has also been considered by Cross J. in S.A. & Ors. v. Refugee Appeals Tribunal [2012] IEHC 101. He held that a demeanour based decision cannot of itself be said to be irrational or unreasonable. 24 The tribunal member's findings in resp......
Get Started for Free