S v S
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1976 |
| Date | 01 January 1976 |
(S.C.)
S
and
S
Welfare of child - Application to vary order - Children aged seven and five years - Husband leaving wife - Husband living with another woman.
The parties were Roman Catholics and were married in July, 1966. There were three children of the marriage aged from six to four years. They lived outside Éire for a short time and returned to live in Cobh in April, 1967. Discord arose between husband and wife, and in April, 1970, the husband left the matrimonial home, taking the three children with him and placing them in the care of his married sister. The wife issued proceedings for the custody of the children, alleging cruelty. He replied with allegations that she had been neglecting the children, and had...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 cases
-
S v S
...priorities of the parents lay in relation to the children which was an important factor in relation to their welfare. O'S. v. O'S.DLTR 110 I.L.T.R. 57 and dicta of Griffin J. in MacD. v. MacD.DLTR 114 I.L.T.R. 66, 79 approved and applied. 2. Whereas general principles concerning questions o......
-
G v an Bord Uchtála
...97. 4 M. v. An Bord Uchtála [1977] I.R. 287. 5 K. v. K. (Supreme Court—31st July, 1974). 6 F., In re [1969] 2 Ch. 238. 7 O'S. v. O'S. (1974) 110 I.L.T.R. 57. 8 Quinn's Supermarket v. The Attorney General [1972] I.R. 1. 9 J. v. C. [1970] A.C. 668. 10 M., In re [1946] I.R. 334. 11 Ryan v. The......
- Child and Family Agency v HL and Another
-
Child and Family Agency v HL and Another
...and the State (which includes the Courts) guarantees to protect the family in its constitution and authority.” 18. In the case of S v S [1976] 110 ILTR 57 Walsh J. ‘All the ingredients which the Act stipulates are to be considered globally. This is not to be decided by the simple method of ......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
The Welfare Principle; A useful though controversial test for Guardianship, Custody, And Access?
...It is a necessary evil that there can be no hard and fast rule on this issue. 30 S v S [1992] 12 ILRM 732 (SC) 31 MB O’S v PO O’S (1974) 110 ILTR 57 (HC, SC) Family Law Essay 5.1 Religious Welfare The seminal decision of Tilson 32 , established “a joint power and duty [of parents] in respec......