Silver Hill Duckling Ltd and Steele v Minister for Agriculture
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1987 |
Neutral Citation | 1986 WJSC-HC 1761 |
Date | 01 January 1987 |
Docket Number | [1984 No. 4847P] |
Court | High Court |
BETWEEN
AND
1986 WJSC-HC 1761
THE HIGH COURT
Synopsis:
MINISTER OF STATE
Discovery
Privilege - Legal professional privilege - Scope of privilege - Point of time for commencement of privilege - ~See~ Practice, documents - (1984/4847 P - O'Hanlon J. - 31/10/86) - [1987] ILRM 516
|Silver Hill Duckling v. Minister for Agriculture|
PRACTICE
Documents
Discovery - Privilege - Legal professional privilege - Scope of privilege - Point of time for commencement of privilege - Plaintiff's motion for further and better discovery - Defendant's claim to privilege concerning documents made "in contemplation of and for the purposes of advising the Minister and his officers in relation to the plaintiff's claim herein, and of being documents of a confidential nature relating to the European Community" - Plaintiff claimed payment of statutory compensation for slaughter of its poultry which had been infected with fowl pest - Outbreak of fowl pest at end of 1983 - Slaughter of poultry between December, 1983, and 13th February, 1984 - On 26/3/84 defendant Minister received from plaintiff a letter claiming compensation greatly in excess of the amount previously assessed as appropriate by the Minister - Held that the defendant Minister was entitled to claim legal professional privilege in relation to documents which had been created, after the litigation had been apprehended or threatened, in the course of the Minister's investigations undertaken for the dominant purpose of his preparations for the apprehended litigation - Held that such privilege extended to communications between the defendant Minister and persons other than his legal advisers - Held that such privilege applied to documents created after 26/3/84 - Held that the defendant Minister was not entitled to claim privilege in relation to the production of documents containing minutes of the meetings of the Standing Veterinary Committee of the E.E.C. recording discussions about the outbreak of avian influenza in Ireland - Held that no issue of public interest had been established by the defendant Minister - (1984/4847 P - O'Hanlon J. - 31/10/86) - [1987] IR 289 [1987] ILRM 516
|Silver Hill Duckling v. Minister for Agriculture|
Citations:
CROMPTON V CUSTOMS & EXCISE COMMISSIONERS 1971 2 AER 378
CROMPTON V CUSTOMS & EXCISE COMMISSIONERS 1973 2 AER 1169
GERAGHTY V MIN LOCAL GOVT 1975 IR 300
MURPHY V DUBLIN CORPORATION 1972 IR 215, 107 ILTR 65
WAUGH V BRITISH RAILWAYS BOARD 1980 AC 521, 1979 3 WLR 150, 1979 2 AER 1169
Judgment delivered by O'Hanlon J., the 31st October,1986
An Order for discovery of documents was made in these proceedings by the Master of the High Court on the 11th October, 1985, and an affidavit of discovery was sworn on behalf of the Defendants on the 3rd Fiarch, 1986, by Michael Cronin, a Civil Servant employed in the Department ofAgriculture.
In paragraph 3 of that affidavit Mr. Cronin claims privilege in respect of certain documents on the following basis:
"3 I object to producing the documents set forth in the Second Part of the First Schedule hereto on the grounds that the said documents are privileged being docuitients made in contemplation of and for the purposes of advising the Canister and his officers in relation to thePlaintiffs" claim herein and of being documents of a confidential nature relating to the European Community."
The Plaintiffs are not satisfied that the Defendants have made full and proper discovery of documents as required by law, in compliance with the Order already made, and now apply for an Order directing and compelling the Defendants to make further and better discovery for the purpose of making good certain omissions.
The application is grounded upon an affidavit of the second named Plaintiff, sworn on the 7th July, 1986, in which it is claimed in the first place that the claim of privilege referred to in paragraph 3 of the original affidavit of discovery is not well-founded, and in the second place reference is made in Paragraphs 4 to 14 (inclusive) of Mr. Steele's affidavit to other relevant documents which he believes came into existence and which are or have been within the Defendants"power or procurement and which have not been discovered.
Dealing first with the claim of privilege, I agree with the contention of the Plaintiffs that privilege is claimed on too wide a basis in paragraph 3 of Mr. Cronin's affidavit. It appears to represent an effort to claim privilege on two separate grounds known to the law, neither of which is clearly identified by the deponent - one ground being what is commonly referred to as legal professional privilege, and the other being the ground that it would be contrary to the public interest to disclose the documents in respect of which privilege is claimed.
I have considered the Defendants" claim of privilege under both of the said headings and I have inspected the file of documents which has been made available to the Court by the Defendants which, apparently, contains all documents in respect of which privilege is claimed under these headings.
Dealing first with the claim to legal professional privilege, I am satisfied that a sustainable claim under this heading may be made in respect of a wider category of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Irish Press Publications Ltd v Minister for Enterprise
...EMPLOYMENT, IRELAND AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEFENDANTS Citations: COMPETITION ACT 1991 SILVERHILL DUCKLING & ORS V MIN AGRICULTURE & ORS 1987 ILRM 516 CROMPTON V CUSTOMS & EXCISE COMRS 1973 2 AER 1169 GE CAPITAL CORPORATE FINANCE GROUP LTD V BANKERS TRUST CO & ORS 1995 1 WLR 172 FLYNN V ......
-
Gallagher v Stanley
...(1976) 135 C.L.R. 674;Waugh v. British Railways Board[1980] A.C. 521considered.Silver Hill Duckling Ltd. v. Minister for Agriculture[1987] I.R. 289;P.J. Carrigan Ltd. v. Norwich Union Fire Society Ltd.[1987] I.R. 618;Davis v. St. Michael's House (Unreported, High Court, Lynch J., 25th Novem......
-
P J Carrigan v Norwich Union Fire Society Ltd
...was for the purpose of preparing for litigation then apprehended or threatened. Silver Hill Duckling Ltd. v. Minister for AgricultureIR[1987] I.R. 289 applied. 2. That from the time the plaintiffs had claimed to be indemnified, the defendants had viewed the claim with suspicion and their mo......
-
Ryanair Ltd v Channel 4 Television Corporation
...documentation that came into existence at that stage was capable of attracting litigation privilege. Silver Hill Duckling Ltd. v. Steele [1987] I.R. 289 considered. 8. That withholding recordings from publicly identified sources did not disentitle the defendants to claim journalistic privil......