State (at the prosecution of John Clarke) v Maura Roche
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1986 |
Date | 01 January 1986 |
Court | High Court |
- Time limit - Summary jurisdiction - Summons - Issue - District Court - Six months time limit for making of complaint in summary offences - Whether complaint must within six months be brought to attention of person authorised to receive it - Whether consideration of complaint and issue of summons are administrative acts capable of being delegated -Rules of the District Court, 1948 (S.R. O. No.431 of 1947), s. 66 - Petty Sessions (Ireland) Act, 1851 (c. 93), ss. 10(4), 21.
The prosecutor garda applied to the Dublin District Court clerk's office for the issue of a summons charging the defendant with an offence under the Road Traffic Acts. The summons which was issued recited on its face that a complaint had been made to the clerk, and purported to be signed by him. On this summons being struck out without prejudice to its being re-entered, due to bad service, a fresh summons was applied for and issued, grounded upon the original complaint but purporting to be signed by a successor to the first District Court clerk. The face of this summons had been altered so that it did not recite that a complaint had been made to the issuing clerk. The respondent District...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
T.D.I. Metro Ltd v Delap (No. 2)
...of Public Prosecutions) v. Michael McDonagh [1996] 1 I.R. 565; [1996] 2 I.L.R.M. 468. The State (Clarke) v. Roche [1986] I.R. 619; [1986] I.L.R.M. 565. The State (Ennis) v. Farrell [1966] I.R. 107. Criminal law - Indictable offence - Power to prosecute - Whether statutory power to prosecute......
-
Criminal Assets Bureau v Kelly
... ... BUREAU APPLICANT AND JOHN KELLY AND T.T. RESPONDENTS ... v McArdle (Unrep, Morris J, 11/5/1998); The State (Clarke) v Roche [1986] IR 619 ; CAB v H ... two children not be revealed in the prosecution of these proceedings; ... 5 ... ...
-
Dubsky v Ireland
...ART 15.2.1 LAURENTIU v MIN FOR JUSTICE 1999 4 IR 26 CITYVIEW PRESS v COMHAIRLE OILIUNA 1980 IR 381 CLARKE, STATE v ROCHE 1986 IR 619 1986 ILRM 565 MCDAID v SHEEHY & ORS 1991 1 IR 1 1989 ILRM 342 BRADY v DONEGAL CO COUNCIL 1989 ILRM 282 CND v PRIME MIN OF UK UNREP QB 17.12.2002 UN SECURIT......
-
Goodman International v Hamilton
...Ltd.) v. Appeal Commissioners (Unreported, High Court, Barron J., 18th December, 1986). The State (Clarke) v. Roche [1986] I.R. 619; [1986] I.L.R.M. 565; [1987] I.L.R.M. 309. The State (Healy) v. Donoghue [1976] I.R. 325; (1975) 110 I.L.T.R. 9; (1976) 112 I.L.T.R. 37. The State (Lynch) v. B......