State (Attorney General) v Shaw

JurisdictionIreland
Judgment Date01 January 1979
Date01 January 1979
Docket Number[1977 No. 34 SS.]
CourtHigh Court
(H.C.)
State (Attorney General)
and
Shaw

District Court -Jurisdiction - Statute - Invalidity - Severance of enactment - District Court Rules, 1948 (S.R. O. No. 431), r. 67 - Customs, Inland Revenue, and Savings Bank Act, 1877 (40 41 Vict. c. 13), s. 5 - Constitution of Ireland, 1937, Article 50.

Section 5 of the Act of 1877 states that in all prosecutions, suits, or proceedings "at the suit of the Crown" under the Customs Acts the same rule as to costs shall be observed as in proceedings between subject and subject. The phrase "at the suit of the Crown" had not been adapted by the Adaptation of Enactments Act, 1922, or otherwise. Rule 67 of the Rules of 1948 gives a District Justice, in any case of summary jurisdiction, a general power to award costs subject to certain exceptions including an exception in respect of proceedings relating to any fine, penalty or forfeiture incurred under the Customs Acts. The prosecutor brought proceedings in the District Court against a certain defendant and sought an order under s. 207 of the Customs Consolidated Act, 1876, condemning certain goods which had been seized by customs officers and directing the sale of the goods. Those proceedings were dismissed by the respondent District Justice, who ordered the prosecutor to pay £45 costs to the defendant. The prosecutor obtained in the High Court a conditional order of certiorari to quash the order of the respondent, unless cause were shown to the contrary, on the ground that the respondent had no power to award costs in those proceedings. The prosecutor applied for an order absolute, notwithstanding the cause shown by the respondent. The respondent contended that, in interpreting s. 5 of the Act of 1877, the words relating to the Crown should be excised as they were inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution, and that the remainder of that section, allowing an award of costs, would then be continued in force by Article 50 of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Southern Hotel Sligo Ltd v Iarnród Éireann
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 13 July 2007
    ...481 and Ex parte Waldron [1986] QB 824 considered; Attorney General v Crawford [1940] IR 335 and The State (Attorney General) v Shaw [1979] IR 136 followed - Rules of the District Court 1997 (SI 93/1997), O 51 - Courts (Supplemental Provisions) Act 1961 (No 39), s 52 - Environmental Prote......
  • DPP v District Judge Elizabeth McGrath
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 21 September 2021
    ...in respect of costs of an unsuccessful prosecution were the subject of further consideration in The State (Attorney General) v. Shaw [1979] I.R. 136, where Finlay P. (as he then was) followed Crawford and held that the provisions of the District Court Rules precluded the award of costs agai......
  • Health Service Executive (HSE) v A (O)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 12 April 2013
    ...1926 r37 DISTRICT COURT RULES 1926 r37(A) DISTRICT COURT RULES 1926 r37(B) CUSTOMS INLAND REVENUE & SAVINGS BANK ACT 1877 S5 AG v SHAW 1979 IR 136 CHILD CARE ACT 1991 S25 CHILD CARE ACT 1991 S25(4) CHILD CARE ACT 1991 S25(5) CHILD CARE ACT 1991 S26(3) CHILD CARE ACT 1991 S3 T (CHILDREN), IN......
  • Blake v Attorney General
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1982
    ...v. The Attorney General [1970] I.R. 317. 34 Maher v. The Attorney General [1973] I.R. 140. 35 State (Attorney General) v. Shaw [1979] I.R. 136. 36 King v. The Attorney General [1981] I.R. 233. Constitution - Statute - Validity Landlord and tenant - Rent and recovery of possession restricted......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT