State (Barry and Others), The v District Justice O Roide in and Another
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1959 |
| Date | 01 January 1959 |
| Court | High Court |
(H.C.)
State (Barry and Others)
and
District Justice O Roidean and Another
Adequacy - Signature to entries by Justice after transfer to another district - Interpretation of Statutes - "Duties" or "Power" - Criminal Justice Act, 1951, s. 21 (1), (2) - District Court Rules, 1948, rule 84 - District Court Rules, 1955, rule 9 - Game Preservation Act, 1930, s. 3 - Protection of Animals Act, 1911, s. 1.
The prosecutors were convicted in the District Court of certain offences. The entries of the convictions in the Justice's Minute Book were not signed by the Justice at the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
1 cases
-
The State (Brien) v Kelly
...Procedure Act, 1967. 2 See p. 78, post. 3 See p. 71, ante. 4 See now s. 13 of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1967. 5 [1945] I.R. 532. 6 [1957] I.R. 148. 7 [1964] I.R. 8 [1964] I.R. 73. 9 [1969] I.R. 273. 10 [1958] 1 W.L.R. 372. 11 See p. 74, ante. 12 See pp. 73, 74, ante. 13 See p. 70, ante. 1......