State (Browne) v Feran
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judgment Date | 24 July 1967 |
Date | 24 July 1967 |
Docket Number | [NO. 59 SS of 1966.] |
Court | Supreme Court |
(S.C.)
State (Browne)
and
Feran
Appeal from decision of High Court granting order of Habeas Corpus - Constitution of Ireland, Articles 34, 36, 40, 50 - Certiorari - Order of District Court -Failure to state jurisdiction on order - Criminal Justice Act, 1951, ss. 2, 3.
The prosecutor was charged with having committed an indictable offence. He was tried summarily in the District Court and convicted of the offence. The District Court was empowered to try the prosecutor summarily under s. 2 of the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
83 cases
-
Eamonn Andrews Productions Ltd v Gaiety Theatre Enterprises Ltd
...34, s. 4, sub-s. 3, of the Constitution. So Held by the Supreme Court (Walsh, Henchy and Griffin JJ.) The State (Browne) v. FeranIR [1967] I.R. 147 and In bonis Morelli, Vella v. MorelliIR [1968] I.R. 11 distinguished. Andrews Productions v. Gaiety Theatre EAMONN ANDREWS PRODUCTIONS LIMITED......
-
People v O'Shea
...restricted or limited meaning. It was this very question which was considered and decided by this Court in The State (Browne) v. Feran 1967 I.R. 147. In that case the prosecutor had obtained an absolute order of habeas corpus in the High Court and the parties who had shown cause sought to ......
-
A.B. v Minister for Justice
...301. The People (A.G.) v. Conmey [1975] I.R. 341. The People v. O'Shea [1982] I.R. 384; [1983] I.L.R.M. 549. The State (Browne) v. Feran [1967] I.R. 147. Sullivan v. Robinson [1954] I.R. 161. Toth v. Austria (1991) 14 E.H.R.R. 551. Warner v. Minister for Industry and Commerce [1929] I.R. 58......
-
DPP v MS
...I.R. 384; [1983] I.L.R.M. 549. The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v. J.T. (1988) 3 Frewen 141. The State (Browne) v. Feran [1967] I.R. 147. The State (Boyle) v. Neylon [1986] I.R. 551; [1986] I.L.R.M. 337; [1987] I.L.R.M. 535. State (O'Connell) v. Fawsitt [1986] I.R. 362; [1986] I......
Get Started for Free