State (Buchan) v Coyne
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | High Court (Irish Free State) |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1936 |
| Date | 01 January 1936 |
[H. C., I.F.S.],
State (Buchan)
and
Coyne
Evidence given in the Irish language- Irish language unknown to defendant or his solicitor - Refusal of District Justice to allow interpretation - Conviction - Conviction quashed- Natural justice.
The prosecutor was charged before a District Justice with the commission of certain offences. When a sergeant of the Civic Guard proceeded to give his evidence in the Irish language the prosecutor's solicitor informed the Court that neither he nor his client had a...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Leonard v District Judge Garavan
...V AG 1998 1 IR 203 HAUGHEY, IN RE 1971 IR 217 FLANAGAN V UCD 1988 IR 724 O'CALLAGHAN V CLIFFORD 1993 3 IR 603 BUCHAN, STATE V COYNE 1936 70 ILTR 185 D V DPP 1994 2 IR 465 BYRNE V MCDONNELL & MURPHY 1997 1 IR 392 1996 1 ILRM 543 MCSORLEY V GOVERNOR OF MOUNTJOY PRISON 1996 2 ILRM 331 1996......
-
State (Vozza), The v District Justice O Floinn and Another
...[1951] I. R. 311. (6) [1946] I. R. 364. (7) [1945] I. R. 43. (8) [1904] 2 I. R. 64. (9) [1948] I. R. 439. (10) [1916] 1 K. B. 337. (11) 70 I. L. T. R. 185. (12) [1929] I. R. 526. (13) [1898] 1 Q. B. 582. (14) [1948] 1 K. B. 158. (15) [1943] I. R. 611. (16) [1947] I. R. 258. (17) [1951] 1 K.......
-
State (Kiernan), The v District Justice de Burca
...(3) [1909] 2 K.B. 748. (4) 10 B & S. 111, 117. (5) [1910] 2 K. B., p. 192. (6) [1892] 1 Q. B. pp. 375-378. (7) 45 L. J. (M. C.) 95. (1) 70 I. L. T. R. 185. (1) Before Maguire C.J. , Lavery , Kingsmill Moore , Ó Dálaigh ó dálaigh andMaguire (1) [1951] I. R. 172. (2) [1957] I. R. 148, at p. 1......
-
State (Healy) v Donoghue
...of the Court. 1 [1960] I.R. 93. 2 [1951] I.R. 113. 3 [1974] I.R. 259. 4 [1965] I.R. 217. 5 [1965] I.R. 294. 6 [1971] I.R. 217. 7 (1936) 70 I.L.T.R. 185. 8 [1974] I.R. 9 (1948) 32 Cr. App. R. 183. 10 [1944] A.C. 149. 11 [1964] 1 W.L.R. 1454. 12 (1942) 316 U.S. 455. 13 (1932) 287 U.S. 45. 14 ......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
An Mithid Duinn an Truicear a Tharraingt ar Airteagal 8.3 de Bhunreacht na hÉireann 1937?
...Niamh Nic Shuibhne, ‘State Duty and the Irish language’ (1997) 19(1) Dublin University Law Journal 33, 36. 17 An Stát (Buchan) v Coyne [1936] 70 ILTR 185. 70 (2020) 19 COLR 71 go bhfuil ‘double right’ ag duine chun Gaeilge a úsáid i gcúirt Éirinneach, mar gheall ar a cheart dlí nádúrtha agu......
-
Case Note: Gaeilge Bhriste? Irish Language Rights in Ó Maicín v Ireland
...Gaeilge sa Ghaeltacht (Stationery Office, Dublin, 2007). 6 Attorney General v Joyce and Walsh [1929] IR 526; The State (Buchan) v Coyne (1936) 70 ILTR 185; The State (Ó Conghaile) v Governor of Limerick Prison , The Irish Independent, 3 February 1937. 7 The difficulties that interpretation ......
