State (Walshe) v Murphy

JurisdictionIreland
CourtHigh Court
Judgment Date16 December 1981
Docket Number[1981 No. 252 SS.]
Date16 December 1981
(S.C.)
The State (Walshe)
and
Murphy

Validity of appointment -Whether appointment of temporary District Justice reviewable by the courts - Statute - Interpreation - Purpose of enactment - Statutory qualifications for person to be appointed - Criminal law - Practice - Fair procedures - Production of document by prosecution - Courts of Justice Act, 1936 (No. 48), s. 51 - Road Traffic (Amendment) Act, 1978 (No. 19), ss. 22, 23 -Constitution of Ireland, 1937, Articles 13, 15, and36.

The prosecutor, as defendant, was convicted in the District Court by the first respondent at the hearing of a complaint that the prosecutor had driven a motor vehicle in a public place while there was present in his body an unlawful concentration of alcohol, contrary to s. 49, sub-s. 3, of the Road Traffic Act, 1961. At the date of the conviction the first respondent was acting as a temporary justice of the District Court, having been appointed to that office by the President of Ireland. Prior to the hearing of the complaint, the complainant had failed to comply with the prosecutor's...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
27 cases
  • Savage v DPP
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 3 July 2008
    ...Whether real risk of unfair trial established - Braddish v DPP [2001] 3 IR 127, Murphy v DPP [1989] ILRM 71, The State (Walshe) v Murphy [1981] IR 275 and Z v DPP [1994] 2 IR 476 followed - Applicant's appeal dismissed (120/2005 - SC - 3/7/2008) [2008] IESC 39 Savage v DPP Facts: The appl......
  • Right to Know CLG v Commissioner for Environmental Information
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 29 April 2022
    ...done or purporting to be done by him in the exercise and performance of these powers and functions.” 4 . In The State (Walshe) v. Murphy [1981] I.R. 275 Finlay P. for the Divisional High Court (Finlay P., Gannon and Hamilton JJ.) said as follows: “… the terms of Article 13 s.8 sub-s. 1, cov......
  • Beades v Ireland
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 3 June 2016
    ...with the Council of State. The President is effectively mandated to appoint the Government's nominee. In the State (Walshe) v. Murphy [1981] I.R. 275, Finlay P. presiding over a court of three judges (the other two judges concurred with his judgment) stated:- 'The President has a very grea......
  • Ashley McGonnell, Oliver Quinlan and John Purcell v Attorney General and DPP
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 16 September 2004
    ...MAHER V AG 1973 IR 140 WHELAN V JUDGE KIRBY & DPP UNREP SUPREME 1.3.2004 ROAD TRAFFIC (AMDT) ACT 1978 S21(3) WALSHE, STATE V MURPHY 1981 IR 275 ROAD TRAFFIC (AMDT) ACT 1978 MURPHY V DPP 1989 ILRM 71 BOWES & MCGRATH V DPP 2003 2 IR 25 BRADDISH V DPP & HAUGH 2001 3 IR 127 2002 1 ILRM 15......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Impartiality in Judicial Appointments: an Absent Concept?
    • Ireland
    • Trinity College Law Review No. X-2007, January 2007
    • 1 January 2007
    ...office holders. These requirements were largely repeated in the Courts (Supplemental Provisions) Act 1961. In The State (Walshe) v Murphy [1981] IR 275, it was held that the qualification requirements set out in the 1961 Act are within the contemplation of Article 360 of the Constitution, w......
  • Judicial Conduct in Ireland: a Framework Fit for Purpose?' the Bangalore Principles and the Judicial Council Act 2019
    • Ireland
    • Irish Judicial Studies Journal No. 1-22, January 2022
    • 1 January 2022
    ...Principles go an important stage further; they envisage a regulatory framework on judicial conduct. 16 See The State (Walshe) v Murphy [1981] IR 275, at 286-287 (Divisional High Court, Finlay P, Gannon and Hamilton JJ). 17 All-Party Oireachtas Committee on the Constitution, Fourth Progress ......