Sweeney v Coote

JurisdictionIreland
Year1907
Date1907
CourtHouse of Lords (Ireland)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
36 cases
  • Coughlan et al. v. Westminer Canada Ltd. et al.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 18 January 1994
    ...is upon the combined or concerted action that the emphasis is laid. One finds it in Allen v. Flood , [1898] A.C. 1; Sweeney v. Coote , [1907] A.C. 221; Sorrell v. Smith , [1925] A.C. 700 and in Greenhalgh v. Mallard , [1947] 2 All E.R. 255. In Sorrell v. Smith , [1925] A.C. 700 Lord Dunedin......
  • Midland Bank Trust Company Ltd v Green (No. 3)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...Sorrell v. Clarke (1965) 109 S.J. 354, C.A. Sorrell v. Smith [1925] A.C. 700, H.L.(E.). Subley v. Mott (1747) 1 Wils.(K.B.) 210. Sweeney v. Coote [1907] A.C. 221, H.L.(I.). Tooth & Co. Ltd. v. Tillyer (1956) 95 C.L.R. 605. United States v. Dege (1960) 364 U.S. 51. Wenman v. Ash (1853) 1......
  • Rodaro v. Royal Bk.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 14 September 1998
    ...(C.A.), refd to. [para. 950]. Lonrho Ltd. v. Shell Petroleum Co., [1981] 2 All E.R. 456 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 950]. Sweeney v. Coote, [1907] A.C. 221 (H.L.), refd to. [para. Nicholls v. Richmond et al., [1984] 3 W.W.R. 719 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 955]. Mooney v. Orr, [1995] B.C.J. No.......
  • Miller (Ed) Sales and Rentals Ltd. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co. et al.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 8 March 1994
    ...refd to. [para. 85]. Saskatchewan Farm and Land Co. v. Smith, [1923] 1 W.W.R. 1179 (Sask. K.B.), refd to. [para. 85]. Sweeney v. Coote, [1907] A.C. 221 (H.L.), refd to. [para. Lapointe v. Wait (J.T.) Co., [1938] 4 D.L.R. 418 (Que. S.C.), refd to. [para. 87]. Exco Corp. et al. v. Nova Scotia......
  • Get Started for Free