The Definition of Death

Date01 January 2012
AuthorJohn Lombard
The Definition of Death
JO HN L OMBA RD
Introduction
In “Aubade” the poet Philip Larkin wrote “[m]ost things may never
happen: this one will”.1This simply sets out that death is something which
cannot be escaped from and is a reality which is to be accepted. However, it
is a reality which is bundled with much philosophical analysis, as wel l as
religious and so cial mores.2Hanafin suggests that, as a result of death
becoming increasingly medicalised, this signals the first move towards “the
need for legal intervention in this area.”3At present, there is no legislative
definition of death in I reland but there have been moves towards the
introduction of such a definition, as seen by the inclusion of a definition of
death in the Draft Proposals for the Human Tissue Bill 2009.4This article
considers whether the definition contained in the Draf t Proposals for the
Human Tissue Bill 2009 is appropriate. Furt hermore, this article aims to
identify a suitable legal framework for defining death.
The background to the definition of death is the first point discussed in this
article. This will set out the development of the cardiopulmonary standard
as well as demonstrating the impact and imp ortance of the definition of
death. For example, the definition has a significant impact on organ
transplantati on, decisions in relation to various aspects of medical
treatment, as well as signalling th e point at which end-of -life care c eases.
The discussion of such issues also serves to demonstrate that medical
technology has advanced to the point where biological indicators of death
are no longer the ulti mate sign of death, a point demonstrated by the
development of transplant surgery where the heartbeat may be stop ped
intentionally. In order to avoid this problem, brain function has been relied
on to inform alternative definitions of death. The relevant Irish reports on
defining death will be set out to demonstrate the evolution of the definition.
1 P. Larkin, “Aubade” in 100 Poems by 100 Poets (London: Methuen, 1986), p.93
2 Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain
Death, “A Definition of Irreversible Coma: Report of the Ad Hoc Committ ee of the
Harvard Medic al School to Examine th e Definition of Brain D eath” (1968) 205(6)
Journal of the American Medical Asso ciation 337, p.337 [hereinafter Harvard
Committee]. More than a medical issue, it also includes “moral, ethical, religious and
legal issues.”
3 P. Hanafin, Last Rights: Death, Dying and the Law in Ireland (Cork: Cork University
Press, 1997), p.7
4 Draft Proposal for General Scheme of the Human Tissue Bill 2009
03 HJ Lombard02_Layout 1 25/06/2012 09:51 Page 63
However, in order to critically assess the definition contained in the Draft
Proposals for the Human Tissue Bil l 2009 it is necessary to consider the
experience of other jurisdictions in identifying an appropriate definition of
death. In particular, this involves drawing on the experience of the United
States, which has had a number of reports addressing both the medical and
legal aspects of the definition. The final point this article will address is
whether there i s a need for legislation to be introduced in this area or
whether a more flexible approach, which may rely on medical guidelines, is
more appropriate. Again, this point will involve comparison of the Irish and
US experiences in order to identify a suitable legal framework. The overall
effect of this is to question all aspects of the definition in the Draft Human
Tissue Bill 2009.
Background to the Definition of Death
Black’s Medical Dictionary defines death as “[t]he ending of life; cessation
of all vital functions and signs.”5These vital functions inclu de respiration
and heartbeat, which is known as the cardiopulmonary standard. Although
the cessation of respirati on and heartb eat seem like obvious indic ators of
death, it is only relatively recently that they ha ve become recognised and
accepted signs of death. The defin ition of death can only become widely
acceptable when the medical technology exists to support the criteria. It was
with the development of the stethoscope6that the cardiopulm onary
standard was trusted. Howeve r, developments in medical technology also
resulted in unintended problems in other regards. This is demonstrated by
the fact that the cardiopulmonary standard is no longer a definitive sign that
a person has died.7The development of the mechanical ventilator allows for
artificial respiration of a person who is unable t o breath e withou t assis -
tance. However, not all patients who are relying on a mechanical ventilator
for continued respiration have the same level of incapacitation. In 1959, it
was proposed by the French neurologists Pierre Mollaret and Ma urice
Goullon8that patients who had “maximal incapacitation”9were in a state
5H. Marc ovitch (ed ), Black’s Medical Dictionary, 41st edn (London: A & C Black
Publishers, 2005), p.458 [hereinafter Marcovitch]
6 M. Alexander, “‘The Rigid Embrace of the Narrow Hous e’: Premature Burial & the
Signs of De ath” (1980) 10(3) The Hastings Ce nter Report 25, p.30; A. Sakula,
“R.T.H. Laënnec 1781–1826: His life and work: a bicentenary appreciation” (1981)
36 Thorax 81, p.81. The Stethoscope was invented by René Laënnec in 1816.
7 Airedale N.H.S. Trust v Bland [1993] A.C. 789, p.878. “In medicine, the cessation of
breathing or of heartbeat is no longer death. By the use of a ventilator, lungs which in
the unaided course of nature would have stopped breathing, can be made to breathe,
thereby sustaining the heartbeat.”
8President’s Council on Bioethics, “Controversies in the Determination of Death”
(Washington: U.S. Government, 2008), p.3 [hereinafter President’s Council]
9 Ibid
64 JOH N LOM BAR D
03 HJ Lombard02_Layout 1 25/06/2012 09:51 Page 64

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT