The Pursuit of Online Regulation at the Price of Article 10 Corrosion: A Case Note on Sanchez v France

Date01 January 2023
AuthorKiri O'Neill
163
e Pursuit of Online Regulation at the Price
ofArticle 10 Corrosion: A Case Note on
Sanchezv France
(2 September 2021, Fih Section ECtHR,
Application No 45581/15; Armed 15 May 2021,
Grand Chamber ECtHR)
KIRI O’NEILL
Introduction
On 15 May 2023, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights
(ECtHR) published its Sanchez v France judgement.1 is anxiously-awaited
appeal armed a September 2021 decision of the Fih Section ECtHR.2 e
application was made by a French politician pertaining to a conviction he received
under French law holding him liable for unlawful comments published on his
Facebook wall by other users. His application was unsuccessful and the conviction
was held not to violate Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights
(ECHR).
Sanchez prompts two provocative questions. What type of statement constitutes
unlawful hate speech? And should social media account holders be liable for the
unlawful hate speech of third parties on their pages? In her dissenting opinion,
Judge Mourou-Vikström of the Fih Section noted that the latter is a novel
question.3 e former, however, is not. Hate speech has been the subject of countless
cases before the ECtHR. In these cases, the Court must engage in a balancing act
between the protection of free speech – a cornerstone of democracy – and the
censure of hateful rhetoric to protect other rights and interests. e ECtHR has
developed a nuanced and robust body of case law in this respect.4 However, the
online aspect of modern hate speech has posed diculties – these cases oen
cannot be shoehorned into the existing law. e judgment of the Fih Section in
Sanchez v France was viewed by many commentators as an ill-balanced analysis and
thus a severe dilution of the right to freedom of expression. Its endorsement by the
Grand Chamber was therefore somewhat surprising. is case note will provide a
synopsis of Sanchez v France and a discussion of its implications.
1 Sanchez v France App No 45581/15 (ECtHR, 15 May 2023) (Sanchez (Grand Chamber)).
2 Sanchez v France App No 45581/15 (ECtHR, 2 September 2021) (Sanchez (Fih Section)).
3 ibid 34 (Mourou-Vikström J, dissenting).
4 See for example David Harris and others, Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (4th
edn, Oxford University Press 2018) 682.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex