The Queen v Westropp and Hurley
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 20 December 1851 |
| Date | 20 December 1851 |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
Cr. Appeal.
Stevens v. Evans 1 W. Blac. 283.
COMMON LAW REPORTS. 217 occupier," as in the former-leaving it open to the inference that a M. T. 1851. r. Aeal. description of the occupier is sufficient.]-Governors of the Poor of C pp Bristol v. Wait (a). THE QUEEN v. HIGGINS. The Attorney-General and J. Perrin (with whom were Harris) were not called on. BLACKBURNE, C. J. The Court are of opinion that the rate is on the face of it valid; and any objection to it should have been taken by an appeal against it. On the other question we have no jurisdiction. Cases brought before this Court should be stated in such a form, and the evidence so set out, as that the matter of fact raising the question of law may distinctly appear. We can but deal with the abstract question of law. Conviction affirmed. (a) I A. & E. 264; S. C. 10 Q. B. 868. THE QUEEN v. WESTROPP and HURLEY. Dec. 20. Trim was a case reserved from the Quarter Sessions of the County of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Donegal County Council v McCrossan
... ... : "In order to make the rate valid, the rate-book must in some way describe the occupier": The Queen v. Boyle (1) In The Queen v. Higgins (2) , it had been held that "the reps. of T. Kavanagh" was a sufficient description, and in The Queen v. Westropp (3) , it was held that "J. Westropp"was sufficient, without setting out the Christian name in full ... ...