Wallace v Fogarty
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Supreme Court (Irish Free State) |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1926 |
| Date | 01 January 1926 |
| Docket Number | (1925. No. 10,603.) |
S. C.,
Wallace
and
Fogarty
Act limited to houses which have been let - Mortgage provisions of Act similarly limited - Mortgage of house not let -Mortgagor, owner in fee, in occupation - Mortgage not within Act - "House or part of a house let as a separate dwelling" - Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest (Restrictions) Act, 1923 (No. 19 of 1923), s. 3 (1), (7) and (8); s. 9 (a).
Section 3 (7) of the Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest (Restrictions) Act, 1923 (No. 19 of 1923), provides: "Subject...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
- Coutts & Company v Duntroom Investment Corporation Ltd
- Falk v Haugh
-
Donnelly v O'Neill
...1 K. B. 252. (2) [1923] 2 K. B. 694. (3) [1922] 1 K. B. 393. (4) [1925] 1 K. B. 362. (5) [1925] 2 K. B. 220. (6) [1926] 1 K. B. 360. (7) [1926] I. R. 255. (8) [1920] W. N. (9) [1929] 1 K. B. 24. (10) [1929] 1 K. B. 103. (1) [1924] 2 K. B. 736. (2) 88 L. J. (K. B.) 839. (3) [1929] 1 K. B. 10......