Administrative Decisions
Latest documents
-
Mr X and the Defence Forces
Whether the Defence Forces has complied with the requirements of section 10 of the Act in its response to the application made by the applicant for a statement of reasons regarding why the applicant was not allowed go home sick before consulting a named Comdt. and where in Defence Forces Regulations this decision is based
-
Mr X and Irish Rail
Whether Irish Rail was justified in redacting, under section 37(1) of the FOI Act, certain information from records coming within the scope of the applicant’s request
-
Mr W and Eirgrid
Whether Eirgrid was justified in refusing access to records relating to procurement for the North South Interconnector Project, under sections 15(1)(a) and 36(1) of the FOI Act
-
Ms Y and Tusla
Whether TUSLA was justified in refusing access, under section 37 of the FOI Act, to a copy of a referral that was sent to TUSLA about the applicant and her children
-
Decision Nº M/21/047 from Competition and Consumer Protection Commission, 2021-10-22
Motor Fuel (Retail/Wholesale)
-
Mr Q and Commission for Regulation of Utilities
Whether the CRU was justified in refusing access to particular categories of records relating to Local Reserve Supply Agreements (LRSA) between EirGrid and a named energy company under sections 29, 30, 35, 36 and 37 of the FOI Act.
-
Mr X and Citizens Information Board
Whether the CIB was justified in refusing access to records in the possession of an identified Money Advice and Budgeting Service (MABS), a service provider, on the ground that it does not hold the records sought for the purposes of the FOI Act and in refusing access to certain information contained in records concerning the service provider under sections 35(1)(b), 36(1)(b) and 37(1) of the FOI Act.
-
Ms X and Mr Y, c/o Z Solicitors and Donegal County Council
Whether the Council was justified in refusing access to the name of the party who reported the applicants’ breach of environmental legislation
-
Mr Y, c/o Z Solicitors and Central Bank of Ireland
Whether the Bank was justified in refusing access to three records relating to an investigation concerning Bloxham Stockbrokers on the basis that the Act does not apply to them, pursuant to Schedule 1, Part 1(b)(i) and whether it was justified in decision to refuse access, under section 15(1)(a), to any other relevant records
-
Mr F and Western Care Association
Whether WCA was justified, under section 37(1) of the Act, in redacting certain information from a number of records relating to the applicant and whether it was justified, under section 15(1)(a) of the Act, in refusing access to any further records on the ground that no further relevant records exist or can be found