Attorney General (Comer) v Shorten
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judgment Date | 10 April 1961 |
Date | 10 April 1961 |
Court | High Court |
False declaration -Burden of proof - Actual knowledge that a declaration false - Means of knowledge as to falsity possessed by the prosecution and defendant respectively - Roads Act, 1920, s. 13 (2).
The defendant was charged in the District Court with having made on the 6th May, 1958, a declaration that his motor car had not been used by him or with his consent since the 31st December, 1957, which he knew to be false or misleading, for the purpose of obtaining a road licence for the said motor car for the period commencing on the 1st May, 1958, and ending on the 30th June, 1958. At the hearing of the charge evidence was adduced by the prosecution that on the 20th April, 1958, the car was seen being driven along the public road, but that the driver could not be identified; that on the 6th May, 1958, the defendant applied for a road licence for the period 1st May, 1958, to 30th June, 1958, and signed a declaration that the car had not been used by him, or with his consent, since the expiration of the previous licence on the 31st December, 1957; and that when interviewed concerning the matter he said that he had no explanation to offer as he believed the declaration to be true. No other evidence was adduced by the prosecution. The defendant applied to have the prosecution dismissed and the District Justice refused the application. Upon the hearing of a Case Stated, it was held by Davitt P.: 1. Where evidence could not be adduced as tothe...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
DPP (at the Suit of Garda Joe Lowney) v Florin Rostas & DPP v Maughan
...PARA 2-36 MCGRATH EVIDENCE PARA 2-37 MIN FOR INDUSTRY & COMMERCE v STEEL 1952 IR 304 MCGOWAN v CARVILLE 1960 IR 330 AG v SHORTEN 1961 IR 304 CRIMINAL LAW Evidence Burden of proof - Shifting of burden - Lawful authority - Elements of crime - Begging - Whether burden of proving accused had......
- People (Attorney-General) v Oglesby
-
People (Attorney General) v Melody
...judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal in The People v. Michael Ogelsby (1966) I.R. 162, following Attorney General (Comer) v. Shorten (1961) I.R. 304. In the view of this Court the direction given by the trial Judge at page 76 was misleading in that it conveyed to the jury that the untru......
-
Chief Inspector Wallace v Martin Stokes
...that the burden of proof on the fraudulent use of certificate charge moved to the defendant, citing the case of A-G (Comer) v Shorten [1961] IR 304. The magistrate did not make express reply to this claim but in the case stated he said that he expressed his conclusion “in terms of a burden ......