Bellew v Cement Ltd

JurisdictionIreland
Judgment Date01 August 1948
Date01 August 1948
CourtSupreme Court
(S.C.),
Bellew
and
Cement Limited

Blasting of stone for manufacture of cement - Injunction - Interlocutory injunction granted to restrain blasting pending hearing of action - Long vacation supervening -Manufacture of cement dependent upon blasting -Defendants sole manufacturers of cement in Eire -Convenience of the public - Whether Court is entitled to consider convenience of public -Principles on which interlocutory injunctions should be granted.

The defendants were the sole manufacturers of cement in Eire. Most of the raw material used in the manufacture was drawn from a quarry which they had purchased from the plaintiff. Some time after this purchase the plaintiff built a house on ground overlooking the quarry. Plaintiff's occupation of this house was interfered with by defendants' blasting operations, and he issued a plenary summons against them, claiming, inter alia, an injunction. On the 29th July, 1946, he applied to Gavan Duffy P. for an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendants from blasting in the quarry, pending the hearing of the action. Defendants urged (inter alia), that, as the long vacation was at hand, such an injunction would involve the cessation of blasting for several months and alleged that this would result in no cement being available at a time when building was an urgent...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • An Post v Irish Permanent Plc
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 Enero 1995
    ...MULLER & CO MARGARINE LTD 1901 AC 217 FINANCE ACT 1926 S46(7) UK FINANCE ACT 1928 S29(4) UK FINANCE ACT 1931 S43(3) UK BELEW V CEMENT LTD 1948 IR 61 GIBBINGS V HUNGERFORD 1904 1 IR 211 PAYTON & CO LTD V SNELLING LAMPARD & CO LTD 1900 17 RPC 635 VINE PRODUCTS LTD V MACKENZIE & CO LTD 1969 R......
  • Lawrence (Katherine) and Another v Fen Tigers Ltd & others (No 1)
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 26 Febrero 2014
    ...of the plaintiffs, then I regret that authority requires me to close my ears to it." So also in Ireland, in the leading case of Bellew v Cement Ltd [1948] Ir R 61, the majority adopted a strict Shelfer approach. Maguire CJ said: "I am of the opinion that the court is not entitled to take th......
  • Buckley v Healy
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 31 Julio 1965
    ...(3) [1915] 2 I. R. 423. (4) [1945] I. R. 78. (5) [1901] 2 I. R. 7. (6) 36 I. L. T. R. 114. (7) [1961] I. R. 239. (8) 94 L. T. 626. (9) [1948] I. R. 61. (10) 65 I. L. T. R. (1) [1945] I. R. 78. (1) [1899] 2 I. R. 108. (1) [1901] 2 I. R. 7. (2) [1902] 1 K. B. 532. (3) [1899] 2 I. R. 108. (1) ......
  • Crevelle v Ling
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 3 Junio 1985
    ...See Halsbury's Laws of England Vol. 34 4th Ed. para 317. C 31 Counsel for the plaintiff referred to James Bellew v. Cement Limited 1948 I.R. 61 and pointed out that the Court is not entitled to consider the inconvenience of the public once rights of private individuals are infringed. Howeve......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT