Bennett v Meade
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1939 |
| Date | 01 January 1939 |
| Court | Circuit Court |
(Cir. Ct.),
Bennett
Applicant
and Meade
Respondent
Application to have standard rent fixed for dwelling-house - Part of dwelling-house decontrolled - Decontrol of part does not affect the control of the whole -Dwelling-house in respect of which application is made is the only dwelling-house control of which is to be considered by the Court - Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest (Restrictions) Act, 1926 (No. 24 of 1926), s. 5 (1), s. 5 (2).
Where part of a dwelling-house to which the Increase of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 cases
-
Curtin v Wilson
...at p. 297. (2) [1932] I. R. 339, at p. 351. (3) [1935] I. R. 272, at p. 280. (4) [1941] I. R. 128, at p. 155. (5) [1941] I. R. 371. (1) 73 I. L. T. R. 78. (2) 135 L. T. R. 26. (3) [1932] A. C. 676. ...
-
Connolly v Gleeson
...reconstructed by way of conversion into two or more separate and self-contained flats or tenements. . . ." (1) [1925] 1 K. B. 563. (2) 73 I. L. T. R. 78. (3) [1938] I. R. (4) [1935] I. R. 286. (1) [1925] 1 K. B. 563. ...