Blythe and Others v Attorney General (No. 2)
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judgment Date | 31 July 1936 |
Date | 31 July 1936 |
Court | High Court (Irish Free State) |
Political association - Formation of association - Action claiming declaration of legality of association - Other relief not claimed - Constitution of the Irish Free State, Art. 2a - "Illegal associations" -Power of Executive Council of the Irish Free State to declare certain associations illegal -Organisations previously formed by plaintiff declared "illegal associations" - Legality of present association not impugned - Jurisdiction to make declaration - Constitution of the Irish Free State (Saorstát Eireann) Act, 1922 (No. 1 of 1922), Sch. I, Arts. 2a and 9 - Constitution (Amendment No. 17) Act, 1931 (No. 37 of 1931) -Rules of the Supreme Court (Ireland), 1905, Or. XXV, r. 5.
Plaintiffs, who had formed certain organisations which had been declared to be unlawful by the Executive Council of the Irish Free State acting under the powers conferred upon the Council by Art. 2a of the Constitution, formed a new association and on the same day instituted proceedings against the Attorney-General. Plaintiffs claimed declarations that they had the right to form the association, that such right was guaranteed to them by...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In the Matter for Mount Carmel Medical Group (South Dublin) Ltd
...to the proper exercise of the Court's discretion. 44 The first is that of Johnston J. in Blythe & Ors. v. Attorney General (No. 2) [1936] I.R. 549. The plaintiffs in that case were the members of the National Executive of Fine Gael, which had resolved to form a subordinate organisation to ......
-
Costello v The Government of Ireland, Ireland, and The Attorney General
...the case could not succeed. Blythe v. Attorney General 76 Much earlier in our legal history, in Blythe v. Attorney General (No. 2) [1936] I.R. 549 (“ Blythe”), the plaintiffs, who had previously formed organisations which had been declared unlawful by the Executive Council of the Irish Free......
- Westminster City Council v Haywood (No. 2)
-
EPUK Investments Ltd v Environmental Protection Agency
...587 §71 & §111 588 §71 et seq citing various cases: including McNally v. Ireland [2011] 4 I.R. 431; Blythe v. Attorney General (No. 2) [1936] I.R. 549; McDonald v. Bord na gCon [1965] I.R. 217; Zalewski v. Workplace Relations Commission [2021] IESC 589 Affidavit #1 Marie O'Connor 17 Novembe......