Bord na gCon v Murphy

JurisdictionIreland
CourtSupreme Court
Judgment Date01 January 1971
Docket Number[S.C. No. 3 1970]
Date01 January 1971
(S.C.)
Bord na gCon
and
Murphy

Hearsay - Statement in writing on subject of offences charged - Statement written and signed by defendant's solicitor apparently on behalf of defendant - Whether statement contained an admission - Proof that defendant made the statement.

The complainants were a statutory body having power to bring prosecutions for contraventions of certain provisions of the Greyhound Industry Act, 1958, and the regulations made thereunder. The complainants wrote to the defendant and...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 cases
  • Walsh v Sligo County Council
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 20 December 2010
    ...[1946] 2 All E.R. 252. Barraclough v. Johnson (1838) 8 Ad. & E. 99; 112 E.R. 773; [1835-42] All E.R. Rep. 606. Bord na gCon v. Murphy [1970] I.R. 301; (1970) 105 I.L.T.R. 77. Bruen v. Murphy (Unreported, High Court, McWilliams J., 11th March, 1980). Capital Trust Co. v. Fowler (1921) 64 D.L......
  • Edward Walsh and Another v County Council for County of Sligo
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 11 November 2013
    ...[1938] 2 All ER 237; Director of Public Prosecutions v Jones [1999] 2 AC 240; In re Ward of Court [1996] 2 IR 79; Bord na gCon v Murphy [1970] IR 301; The King v Lambe (1791) 2 Leach 552; Morrissey v Boyle [1942] IR 514; Woolway v Rowe (1834) 1 Ad & El 114; M'Kenna v Earl of Howth (1893) 2......
  • Walsh & Cassidy v Sligo County Council
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 20 December 2010
    ...An admission is a statement made by a party which is adverse to his or her case. As stated by Ó Dálaigh C.J. in Bord na gCon v. Murphy [1970] I.R. 301, 310, although in the context of criminal proceedings and ultimately finding that the statements in question were not in fact admissions:- "......
  • Smurfit Paribas Bank Ltd v A.A.B. Export Finance Ltd
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 15 February 1990
    ...C.L.R. 52. Balabel v. Air India [1988] Ch. 317; [1988] 2 W.L.R. 1036; [1988] 2 All E.R. 246; (1988) 132 S.J. 699. Bord na gCon v. Murphy [1970] I.R. 301; (1970) 105 I.L.T.R. 77. Cook v. Carroll [1945] I.R. 515; (1945) 79 I.L.T.R. 116. Dubai Bank Ltd. v. Galadari [1990] Ch. 981; [1989] 3 All......
  • Get Started for Free