O'Brien v Condon

CourtHigh Court
Docket Number(1904. No. 850.)
Judgment Date11 Nov 1904
JurisdictionIreland
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Revenue Commissioners v Stapleton and O'brien
    • Ireland
    • High Court (Irish Free State)
    • 24 February 1937
    ...the will and not by virtue of the will. Attorney-General v. CullenUNK, 14 Ir. C. L. R. 137; L. R. 1 H. L. 190; andO'Brien v. CondonIR, [1905] 1 I. R. 51, followed. In re Fleetwood, 15 Ch. D. 594, and Blackwell v. Blackwell, [1929] A. C. 318, distinguished. Cur. adv. vult. Hanna J. :— The Re......
  • Lim Lie Hoa v Ong Jane Rebecca and Others and Another Appeal (No 2)
    • Singapore
    • Court of Three Judges (Singapore)
    • 4 May 2005
    ...distribution of an estate” given by Black’s Law Dictionary (West Group, 7th Ed, 1999); (b) Porter MR’s statement in O’Brien v Condon [1905] 1 IR 51 at 55 that he could not “see any solid distinction in law or fact between “distribute” and “dispose (c) the view of Swinfen Eady J in Re Mackin......
  • Re Browne; Ward v Lawler
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 29 July 1944
    ...question 1 (a)in the affirmative. (1) I. R. 10 Eq. 469. (2) 21 L. R. Ir. 273. (3) [1929] A. C. 318. (4) 26 Ch. D. 531, at p. 535. (5) [1905] 1 I. R. 51. (6) [1920] 2 Ch. (7) [1902] 1 I. R. 172, 224. (8) 62 I. L. T. R. 61. (9) [1937] Ch. 236. (10) 5 De G. & Sm. 85. (1) [1937] 1 Ch. 236. ......
  • Lim Lie Hoa v Ong Jane Rebecca and Others and Another Appeal (No 2)
    • Singapore
    • Court of Three Judges (Singapore)
    • 4 May 2005
    ...distribution of an estate” given by Black’s Law Dictionary (West Group, 7th Ed, 1999); (b) Porter MR’s statement in O’Brien v Condon [1905] 1 IR 51 at 55 that he could not “see any solid distinction in law or fact between “distribute” and “dispose (c) the view of Swinfen Eady J in Re Mackin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results