British Leyland Exports v Brittain Manufacturing
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | High Court |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1982 |
| Docket Number | [1976 No. 169] |
| Date | 01 January 1982 |
Exclusion clause - Effect - Agreement between manufacturer and importer for supply of motor cars and components -Breach of manufacturer's primary obligation to supply vehicles - Clause excluding importer's claim to damages - Agreement made in context of commitments made by parties to the Government - Whether construction of agreement affected - Agreement not repudiated by importer.
By an agreement dated the 9th May, 1966, the plaintiffs gave the first defendants the exclusive right to sell to traders in Ireland motor cars manufactured by the plaintiffs in England, and the plaintiffs were bound to deliver to the first defendants from time to time the number of vehicles specified in the agreement. Most of the vehicles supplied to the first defendants pursuant to that agreement were delivered in the form of kits...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
O'Neill v Ryan (No. 3)
...Ryan, and Kevin O'Brien, Defendants (No. 3) Cases mentioned in this report:— British Leyland Exports v. Brittain Manufacturing Ltd. [1981] I.R. 335; [1982] I.L.R.M. 359. Burrow v. Scammell (1881) 19 Ch. D. 175; 51 L.J. Ch. 296; 45 L.T. 606. Eastes v. Russ [1914] 1 Ch. 468. Galloway v. Gallo......
-
Parol Ltd & Caroll Village (Retail) Management Services Ltd v Friends First Pension Funds Ltd & Superquinn
...2 EGLR 83; Moulton Buildings Limited v Westminster [1975] 30 P&CR 182; British Leyland Exports Limited v Britain Group Sales Limited [1981] IR 335; Irish Telephone Rentals v ICS Building Society [1991] ILRM 880; Hong Kong Fir Shipping Company v Kawasaki [1962] 2 QB 26 and Aldin Latimer Clar......
-
O'Neill v Ryan
...( 1971 3 All E.R. 237). The passage ofPrenn (approved by Mr. Justice O'Hanlon in British Leyland Exports .v. British Manufacturing Ltd. (1981) I.R. 335, at 346) to which I was referred is as follows:- "The time has long passed when agreements, even those under seal, were isolated from the m......
-
iPromise: How Contract Theory Can Inform Regulation of Online Consumer Contracts
...Ltd v North Western Health Board [2005] IESC 44, [2005] 4 IR 124. 111 ibid 130. 112 British Leyland Exports Ltd v Brittain Sales Ltd [1981] IR 335 (HC). [2018] iPromise 189 would not necessarily see its validity undermined as a result. 113 Although that case involved two commercial parties,......