Burke and O'Reilly v Burke and Quail

JurisdictionIreland
Judgment Date01 January 1951
Date01 January 1951
Docket Number(1949. No. 2243.)
CourtHigh Court
Burke and O'Reilly
and
Burke and Quail

Bequest - Condition -Direction that trustees should have absolute discretion in selecting school for infant - Whether consistent with parental right and duty - The Constitution, Art. 42 - Conditions subsequent -Uncertainty - Forfeiture clause - "Cease to practise the Roman Catholic religion" - "Leave Ireland without consent of trustees for period exceeding six months" - Vested interest.

A testatrix by her will left the residue of her property upon trust after conversion and reinvestment to pay and use the income for the purpose of maintaining, educating in Ireland and bringing up as a Roman Catholic one, G.Q., an infant, and directed 1, that the selection of a Roman Catholic school to be attended by G.Q. should be in the absolute discretion of the trustees, and 2, that upon G.Q. leaving school and taking up a position the income should be paid to him until he attained the age of twenty-five years and that thereafter the residue should be paid to him absolutely. The testatrix further provided that if at any time G.Q. should leave Ireland without the consent of the trustees for any period exceeding six months or should cease to practise the Roman Catholic religion he should forfeit all benefit under the will. G.Q. had lived in England for about three years prior to the death of the testatrix and had since continued to live in that country. On the hearing of a summons for the determination of certain questions arising on the construction of the will, it...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Re Blake, Deceased
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 8 March 1955
    ...to provide for the education of their children declared by Article 42 of the Constitution. Burke and O'Reilly v. Burke and QuailIR, [1951] I.R. 216 followed. 2, The condition upon which the gift of the income of the trust legacy was given being void the gift failed. Whether the said conditi......
  • Corrigan (plaintiff) v Corrigan & Corrigan
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 2 November 2007
    ...v KELLY UNREP LAFFOY 19.6.2007 2007 IEHC 228 MACKESSY v FITZGIBBON 1993 1 IR 520 PORTER, RE 1975 NI 157 BURKE & O'REILLY v BURKE & QUAIL 1951 IR 216 THEOBALD ON WILLS 16ED 2001 PARA 53.36 LYALL LAND LAW IN IRELAND 2ED 2000 179 AG v CUMMINS & ORS 1906 1 IR 406 PROBATE Wills Construction - ......
  • McGowan v Kelly
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 19 June 2007
    ...KELLY DECEASED BETWEEN/ HILDA McGOWAN PLAINTIFF AND BRIAN KELLY DEFENDANT SUCCESSION ACT 1965 S90 BURKE & O'REILLY v BURKE & QUAYLE 1951 IR 216 MOFFAT v MCCLEARY 1923 1 IR 16 SIFTON v SIFTON 1938 AC 656 MOTHERWAY v COGHLAN & AG 1963 IR 246 HENNESSY v HENNESSY & ORS 1963 ILTR 39 MACKESSY v F......
2 books & journal articles
  • Testamentary conditions in restraint of religion in the twenty-first century: an Anglo-Canadian perspective.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 50 No. 3, November 2005
    • 1 November 2005
    ...[McKenna] (in the Republic of Ireland). (63) McKenna, ibid. at 285, Gavan Duffy P. However, in Burke and O'Reilly v. Burke and Quail, [1951] I.R. 216 (H.C.), the same judge held that a provision for forfeiture if the beneficiary should cease to "practice" the Roman Catholic faith was void f......
  • The construction of conditions attaching to gifts in wills
    • Ireland
    • Irish Judicial Studies Journal No. 1-8, January 2008
    • 1 January 2008
    ...attaching to a gift in the will. In Corrigan v. Corrigan & Anor15 McGovern J. summarised these principles as follows: 10Re Burke [1951] I.R. 216 at 224 per Gavan Duffy J. 11 Re Farrelly [1941] I.R. 261 at 268 per Gavan Duffy J. 12 Re Porter [1975] N.I. 157 at 160 per Lowry L.C.J.; see also ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT