Byrne v an Taoiseach and Others
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judge | Miss Justice Laffoy |
Judgment Date | 09 September 2010 |
Neutral Citation | [2010] IEHC 353 |
Court | High Court |
Docket Number | [2008 No. 2669 P] |
Date | 09 September 2010 |
BETWEEN
AND
[2010] IEHC 353
THE HIGH COURT
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
Access to records
Confidential evidence given in private to commission - Right to effective remedy - Whether plaintiffs entitled to access commission archive - Whether legally enforceable right of access to commission - Whether compatible with European Convention on Human Rights - Commission of Investigation Act 2004 (No. 23), ss 3, 11(3), 43(1) - Data Protection Act 1988 (No 25) - Freedom of Information Act 1997 (No 13) - National Archives Act 1986 (No 11), ss 2, 8 and 10 - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, articles 2, 6 and 13 Relief refused (2008/2669P - Laffoy J - 9/9/2010) [2010] IEHC 353
Byrne v An Taoiseach
HUMAN RIGHTS
European Convention
Direct effect - Application of Convention within State - Retrospective effect - Compatibility with European Convention on Human Rights - Obligation to conduct investigation - Right to life - Commission of Investigation into the Dublin and Monaghan bombings 1974 - Whether Convention provisions directly justiciable - Whether defendants' investigation compliant with domestic law obligations under Convention - Whether plaintiffs entitled to Convention compliant investigation - Whether obligations imposed by Act applied to deaths which occurred prior to enactment - Whether defendants breached obligations under Act of 2003 - In re Ó Laighléis [1960] IR 93 and Dublin City Council v. Fennell [2005] IESC 33, [2005] 1 IR 604 followed; Doyle v Commissioner of An Garda Síochána [1999] 1 IR 249, In re McKerr [2004] UKHL 12, [2004] 1 WLR 807, Brecknell v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 42, Lelimo v Minister for Justice [2004] IEHC 165, [2004] 2 IR 178, Magee v Farrell [2005] IEHC 388, (Unrep, Gilligan J, 26/10/2005), D v Residential Institutions Redress Review Committee [2008] IEHC 350, (Unrep, Ó Néill J, 11/11/2008) and O'Neill v An Taoiseach [2009] IEHC 119 (Unrep, Murphy J, 18/3/2009) considered - European Convention on Human Rights Act 2003 (No 20), ss 2, 3, 4, 5 and 9 - Commission of Investigation Act 2004 (No 23), ss 3, 11(3), 43(1) - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, articles 2, 6 and 13 - Relief refused (2008/2669P - Laffoy J - 9/9/2010) [2010] IEHC 353
Byrne v An Taoiseach
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S3
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S43(1)
CMSN OF INVESTIGATION INTO THE DUBLIN & MONAGHAN BOMBINGS OF 1974 - FINAL REPORT 2007 CHAP 11
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S43(2)
CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 2
CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 13
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S11(3)
CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 6
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S5
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S11
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S2
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S3
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S4
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S2(1)
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S1
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S3(1)
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S9(2)
SILIH v SLOVENIA 2009 49 EHRR 37
CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 3
CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 14
BLECIC v CROATIA 2005 41 EHRR 13
MCCANN & ORS v UNITED KINGDOM 1996 21 EHRR 97
VARNAVA & ORS v TURKEY UNREP 18.9.2009 2009 ECHR 1313
DVORACEK & DVORACKOVA v SLOVAKIA UNREP 28.7.2009 2009 ECHR 1225
BRECKNELL & ORS v UNITED KINGDOM 2008 46 EHRR 42
MCKERR v UNITED KINGDOM 2002 34 EHRR 20
LELIMO v MIN FOR JUSTICE 2004 2 IR 178 2004/27/6362 2004 IEHC 165
DPP (KELLY) v O'SULLIVAN UNREP DUNNE 11.10.2005 2005/22/4525 2005 IEHC 389
D (J) v RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONS REDRESS REVIEW COMMITTEE & ORS 2009 2 ILRM 65 2008/11/2146 2008 IEHC 350
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL v FENNELL 2005 1 IR 604 2005 2 ILRM 288 2005/17/3473 2005 IESC 33
HOUSING ACT 1966 S62
MCKERR, IN RE 2004 1 WLR 807 2004 2 AER 409 2004 NI 212
HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 S6 (UK)
R (HUNT) v LONDON NORTHERN DISTRICT CORONER 2007 2 AC 189 2007 2 WLR 726 2007 2 AER 1025
HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 S3 (UK)
HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 S2 (UK)
MCD (J) v L (P) & M (B) 2010 1 ILRM 461 2009/34/8411 2009 IESC 81
R (ULLAH) v SPECIAL ADJUDICATOR 2004 2 AC 323 2004 3 WLR 23 2004 3 AER 785
O LAIGHLEIS, IN RE 1960 IR 93
CONSTITUTION ART 29
DOYLE v CMSR OF AN GARDA SIOCHANA 1999 1 IR 249
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 PART III
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S11(1)(A)
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S11(1)(B)
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S11(3)(C)
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S11(3)(D)
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S11(4)
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S11(5)
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 PART V
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 PART VI
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S39
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S40
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S41
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S41(1)
NATIONAL ARCHIVES ACT 1986 S2(2)
NATIONAL ARCHIVES ACT 1986 S8(4)
SHANAGHAN v UNITED KINGDOM 2001 INQUEST LR 149
FINUCANE v UNITED KINGDOM 2003 37 EHRR 29 2003 1 POL LR 323 2003 AER (D) 25 (JUL) 2003 INQUEST LR 157
KHALITOVA v RUSSIA UNREP ECHR 5.3.2009 (APPLICATION NO 39166/04)
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S43(3)
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S45
COMMISSIONS OF INVESTIGATION ACT 2004 S45(1)
NATIONAL ARCHIVES ACT 1986 S10(6)
NATIONAL ARCHIVES ACT 1986 S10
NATIONAL ARCHIVES ACT 1986 S8
NATIONAL ARCHIVES ACT 1986 S10(1)
O'NEILL & ORS v AN TAOISEACH & ORS UNREP MURPHY 18.3.2009 2009/45/11362 2009 IEHC 119
Judgment of Miss Justice Laffoy delivered on the 9th day of September, 2010.
2 1.1 These proceedings arise out of the atrocities which have become known as the Dublin and Monaghan Bombings, which occurred on 17 th May, 1974. The first plaintiff was seriously injured as a result of the car bomb explosion in Parnell Street in Dublin City on that day. The second plaintiff is a sister of Mary McKenna, who was killed as a result of the car bomb explosion in Talbot Street in the City of Dublin on the same day. The third named plaintiff is a body corporate which was established to provide support for, and advance the interests of, those bereaved and injured as a result of the Dublin and Monaghan bombings.
3 1.2 These proceedings are the result of dissatisfaction on the part of the plaintiffs with the police investigations and other investigations and inquiries which have been carried out by the State into the atrocities, in which 33 people lost their lives and almost 300 people were injured. The following outline of the relevant facts is almost exclusively a chronology of the investigations and inquiries carried out by organs of the State since 1974 and is based on a statement of facts filed on behalf of the plaintiffs on 15 th October, 2009 and the appendix to the written submissions of the defendants filed on 14 th October, 2009 on the chronology of the investigations and inquiries in relation to the bombings.
4 1.3 An investigation by An Garda Síochána began immediately following the bombings. That first phase of the investigation came to an end in August 1974. Between 1974 and 1979, further inquiries were carried out in response to further information. Between 1980 and 1987, no new information was added to Garda files.
5 1.4 What precipitated the next stage of the investigation was the broadcasting on 6 th July, 1993 of a Yorkshire Television documentary entitled "Hidden Hand - The Forgotten Massacre". That programme raised concerns as to the existence of collusion between Loyalist paramilitaries and members of the security forces in Northern Ireland in connection with the bombings. Following that broadcast, there were further investigations by the Gardaí through 1993 and 1994. Material was sent to the Director of Public Prosecutions in March 1994 but no prosecution ensued, because the Director was of the opinion that there was no evidence on which a prosecution could be initiated, nor was there any further line of inquiry which might alter the situation. Nonetheless, the inquiries continued through 1994. On the 21 st anniversary of the bombings on 17 th May, 1995, the Minister for Justice met representatives of the bereaved and injured and, in a statement issued following the meeting, she indicated that the crimes would remain an "open case" and, if any lead should emerge which might bring the culprits to justice, it would be pursued vigorously.
6 1.5 While this stage is not included in the defendants' chronology, as a result of the Good Friday Agreement, which was signed on 10 th April, 1998 and ratified on 22 nd May, 1998, which recognised the needs of victims of violence and contained commitments to acknowledge and address their suffering, John Wilson, former Tánaiste, was appointed Victims Commissioner on 25 th June 1998. The report of the Victims Commission, which was published on 6 th August, 1999 made recommendations in relation to an inquiry into the Dublin and Monaghan bombings.
7 1.6 Before that report was published, however, an event occurred which triggered further Garda investigations. In January 1999, John Weir, who was a former member of the Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC) and who had served a prison sentence for his...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wallace v Creevey
...or as affecting past events.’ The issues of justiciability and retrospectivity were considered by this court in Byrne v. An Taoiseach [2011] 1 I.R. 190 where Laffoy J. identified the issues arising as including (at p. 199): ‘(a) whether the provisions of articles 2, 6 and 13 of the Conventi......
-
Naughton v Dummond
...or as affecting past events.' The issues of justiciability and retrospectivity were considered by this court in Byrne v. An Taoiseach [2011] 1 I.R. 190 where Laffoy J. identified the issues arising as including (at p. 199): '(a) whether the provisions of articles 2, 6 and 13 of the Convent......
-
Rodenhuis & Verloop BV v HDS Energy Ltd
... 1996 2 IR 459 1995/20/5287 GILROY v FLYNN 2005 1 ILRM 290 2004/19/4269 2004 IESC 98 BYRNE & ORS v TAOISEACH & ORS UNREP LAFFOY 9.9.2010 2010 IEHC 353 O LAIGHLEIS, IN RE 1960 IR 93 EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S2 EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S4 PRICE & LOWE......
-
Thomas Fox v The Minister for Justice and Equality, Ireland and The Attorney General
...national law, rather than the international instrument itself, specifies. Faherty J. then considered the judgment of Laffoy J. in Byrne v. An Taoiseach [2011] I.R. 190, in which it was concluded that was no basis on which any provision of the ECHR was directly justiciable as a matter of dom......